Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

Posted by Nancey on Mar 24, 2025 at 07:43 AM

A client has a requirement to allow users on the Storefornt to filter by a newly created attribute.

Which is necessary to achieve this?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
MA
Malcom 10 months ago
Not sure if that's the best approach, sounds complicated.
VE
Vernell 11 months ago
Wait, can you really change the template for this?
KA
Karol 11 months ago
Isn't setting the attribute as Searchable also important?
TR
Truman 11 months ago
Totally agree, that's the way to go!
GL
Glenn 11 months ago
You need to add a new Search Refinement Definition.
YE
Yesenia 11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I also feel like setting the attribute as searchable is crucial. It’s confusing!
JO
Jodi 12 months ago
Changing the productsearchrefinerbar.iml template sounds familiar, but I feel like that might be more about the layout than filtering.
DO
Doyle 12 months ago
I remember something about adding a new Search Refinement Definition from our practice questions, but I can't recall the exact steps.
AL
Alva 1 year ago
I think we need to set the attribute as searchable, but I'm not entirely sure if that's enough on its own.
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
I've got this! The answer is definitely B. Setting the attribute as Searchable is the key to enabling the filtering functionality. Easy peasy!
BE
Benedict 1 year ago
Changing the productseachrefinerbar.iml template? That doesn't sound right to me. I think the answer is either A or B, but I'm not sure which one is the best approach. I'll have to think about this a bit more.
CR
Cristal 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. If the requirement is to allow users to filter by a new attribute, then we'll need to make sure that attribute is set as Searchable. That's what option B is saying, so I'm leaning towards that.
TE
Tegan 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Adding a new Search Refinement Definition sounds like it could be the right approach, but I'm not 100% sure. Maybe I'll review the documentation again before deciding.
DA
Dana 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to make sure the attribute is set as Searchable, so I'll go with option B.
JA
Janine 2 years ago
Wait, is the answer 'all of the above'? I mean, why not cover all your bases, right? Oh, wait, that's not an option. Nevermind.
MI
Micaela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Janine
C) Change the productseachrefinerbar.iml template.
BE
Benton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Janine
A) Add a new Search Refinement Definition.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Janine
B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
NA
Nan 2 years ago
I'm stumped. This question is giving me a headache. Maybe I should just guess and hope for the best. *sigh*
SV
Svetlana 2 years ago
Change the productseachrefinerbar.iml template? Really? That sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. I'm going with option B.
NE
Nettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
Benton: Definitely, changing the template seems like too much unnecessary work.
JE
Jean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
User 3: Adding a new Search Refinement Definition could also work, but setting it as searchable is more straightforward.
BE
Benton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
User 2: Yeah, that way users can easily filter by the new attribute on the Storefront.
RO
Ronnie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
User 1: I agree, setting the attribute as searchable seems like the easiest option.
JO
Joesph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
Great choice, that should work well for the client's needs.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
Definitely, it's the most straightforward way to achieve the requirement.
DA
Daniel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
I agree, that seems like the simplest solution.
RO
Roxane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
I agree, that seems like the simplest solution.
ID
Idella 2 years ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
KE
Keneth 2 years ago
↳ replying to Svetlana
Option B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
IL
Iluminada 2 years ago
Aha, I think the answer is to add a new Search Refinement Definition. That's the way to hook up the new attribute to the search functionality.
CA
Cassi 2 years ago
I think both A) and B) are necessary to achieve this. We need to define the search refinement and make the attribute searchable.
LA
Lamonica 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure I need to set the attribute as Searchable. That's the key to enabling users to filter by it.
CA
Cathrine 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Add a new Search Refinment Definition.
TW
Twanna 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel