Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CCM-101 exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 9

[All CCM-101 Questions]

A client has a requirement to allow users on the Storefornt to filter by a newly created attribute.

Which is necessary to achieve this?

AAdd a new Search Refinment Definition.

BSet the attribute as Searchable.

CChange the productseachrefinerbar.iml template

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Nancey at Mar 24, 2025, 07:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Malcom

8 months ago

Not sure if that's the best approach, sounds complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

9 months ago

Wait, can you really change the template for this?

upvoted 0 times

...

Karol

9 months ago

Isn't setting the attribute as Searchable also important?

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

9 months ago

Totally agree, that's the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

9 months ago

You need to add a new Search Refinement Definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yesenia

10 months ago

I’m leaning towards option A, but I also feel like setting the attribute as searchable is crucial. It’s confusing!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jodi

10 months ago

Changing the productsearchrefinerbar.iml template sounds familiar, but I feel like that might be more about the layout than filtering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doyle

10 months ago

I remember something about adding a new Search Refinement Definition from our practice questions, but I can't recall the exact steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alva

10 months ago

I think we need to set the attribute as searchable, but I'm not entirely sure if that's enough on its own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

10 months ago

I've got this! The answer is definitely B. Setting the attribute as Searchable is the key to enabling the filtering functionality. Easy peasy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Benedict

11 months ago

Changing the productseachrefinerbar.iml template? That doesn't sound right to me. I think the answer is either A or B, but I'm not sure which one is the best approach. I'll have to think about this a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

11 months ago

Okay, let's think this through. If the requirement is to allow users to filter by a new attribute, then we'll need to make sure that attribute is set as Searchable. That's what option B is saying, so I'm leaning towards that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

11 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. Adding a new Search Refinement Definition sounds like it could be the right approach, but I'm not 100% sure. Maybe I'll review the documentation again before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

11 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to make sure the attribute is set as Searchable, so I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

1 year ago

Wait, is the answer 'all of the above'? I mean, why not cover all your bases, right? Oh, wait, that's not an option. Nevermind.

upvoted 0 times

Micaela

1 year ago

C) Change the productseachrefinerbar.iml template.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

1 year ago

A) Add a new Search Refinement Definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

1 year ago

B) Set the attribute as Searchable.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Nan

1 year ago

I'm stumped. This question is giving me a headache. Maybe I should just guess and hope for the best. *sigh*

upvoted 0 times

...

Svetlana

1 year ago

Change the productseachrefinerbar.iml template? Really? That sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. I'm going with option B.

upvoted 0 times

Nettie

1 year ago

Benton: Definitely, changing the template seems like too much unnecessary work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

1 year ago

User 3: Adding a new Search Refinement Definition could also work, but setting it as searchable is more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, that way users can easily filter by the new attribute on the Storefront.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

1 year ago

User 1: I agree, setting the attribute as searchable seems like the easiest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joesph

1 year ago

Great choice, that should work well for the client's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

1 year ago

Definitely, it's the most straightforward way to achieve the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

1 year ago

I agree, that seems like the simplest solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

1 year ago

I agree, that seems like the simplest solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Idella

1 year ago

B) Set the attribute as Searchable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

1 year ago

Option B) Set the attribute as Searchable.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Iluminada

1 year ago

Aha, I think the answer is to add a new Search Refinement Definition. That's the way to hook up the new attribute to the search functionality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

1 year ago

I think both A) and B) are necessary to achieve this. We need to define the search refinement and make the attribute searchable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamonica

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm pretty sure I need to set the attribute as Searchable. That's the key to enabling users to filter by it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Add a new Search Refinment Definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twanna

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Set the attribute as Searchable.

upvoted 0 times

...