Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CCM-101 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 9
[All CCM-101 Questions]

A client has a requirement to allow users on the Storefornt to filter by a newly created attribute.

Which is necessary to achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nancey at Mar 24, 2025, 07:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Malcom
4 months ago
Not sure if that's the best approach, sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
4 months ago
Wait, can you really change the template for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
4 months ago
Isn't setting the attribute as Searchable also important?
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
5 months ago
Totally agree, that's the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
You need to add a new Search Refinement Definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I also feel like setting the attribute as searchable is crucial. It’s confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
5 months ago
Changing the productsearchrefinerbar.iml template sounds familiar, but I feel like that might be more about the layout than filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
5 months ago
I remember something about adding a new Search Refinement Definition from our practice questions, but I can't recall the exact steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
6 months ago
I think we need to set the attribute as searchable, but I'm not entirely sure if that's enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
6 months ago
I've got this! The answer is definitely B. Setting the attribute as Searchable is the key to enabling the filtering functionality. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
6 months ago
Changing the productseachrefinerbar.iml template? That doesn't sound right to me. I think the answer is either A or B, but I'm not sure which one is the best approach. I'll have to think about this a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. If the requirement is to allow users to filter by a new attribute, then we'll need to make sure that attribute is set as Searchable. That's what option B is saying, so I'm leaning towards that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Adding a new Search Refinement Definition sounds like it could be the right approach, but I'm not 100% sure. Maybe I'll review the documentation again before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to make sure the attribute is set as Searchable, so I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
12 months ago
Wait, is the answer 'all of the above'? I mean, why not cover all your bases, right? Oh, wait, that's not an option. Nevermind.
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
11 months ago
C) Change the productseachrefinerbar.iml template.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
11 months ago
A) Add a new Search Refinement Definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
12 months ago
I'm stumped. This question is giving me a headache. Maybe I should just guess and hope for the best. *sigh*
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
1 year ago
Change the productseachrefinerbar.iml template? Really? That sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. I'm going with option B.
upvoted 0 times
Nettie
11 months ago
Benton: Definitely, changing the template seems like too much unnecessary work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
11 months ago
User 3: Adding a new Search Refinement Definition could also work, but setting it as searchable is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that way users can easily filter by the new attribute on the Storefront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
11 months ago
User 1: I agree, setting the attribute as searchable seems like the easiest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
11 months ago
Great choice, that should work well for the client's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
Definitely, it's the most straightforward way to achieve the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
11 months ago
I agree, that seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
11 months ago
I agree, that seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
12 months ago
B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
12 months ago
Option B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
Aha, I think the answer is to add a new Search Refinement Definition. That's the way to hook up the new attribute to the search functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 year ago
I think both A) and B) are necessary to achieve this. We need to define the search refinement and make the attribute searchable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure I need to set the attribute as Searchable. That's the key to enabling users to filter by it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Add a new Search Refinment Definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Set the attribute as Searchable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel