Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Architect Topic 8 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Architect exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 8
[All B2C Commerce Architect Questions]

The Client is planning to switch to a new Payment Service Provider (PSP). They have approached an Architect to understand the time and effort to Integrate the new PSP The PSP offers a LINK cartridge compatible with SiteGenesisPipelines, but the Client's website is build on Controllers.

Which two options should the Architect take into consideration before starting analysis? Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Leigha
27 days ago
I hear the PSP team is offering a 'link' to the past with their LINK cartridge. But I'd rather not go on a 'controller' quest to make it work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
1 months ago
I don't know, man. Integrating a new PSP sounds like a real headache. You know what they say – 'the payment piper must be paid.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
1 months ago
A proof of concept might be worthwhile, but I'm not sure I'd want to bet the farm on it. Seems like a lot of work for something that may or may not work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
2 months ago
Converting pipelines to controllers could be a massive undertaking. I'd recommend exploring other PSPs that already support controllers to save time and reduce risk.
upvoted 0 times
Alberta
1 months ago
D) Look for a different PSP that supports controllers and would not require conversion efforts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
1 months ago
A) Estimate the effort and risk to convert the LINK cartridge from pipelines to controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bobbie
2 months ago
I believe reaching out to the PSP development team, as mentioned in option B, is crucial to understand future compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 months ago
I agree with Nidia. Option C could also be a good approach to start with a proof of concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
2 months ago
I think option A is important to consider because it involves estimating effort and risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
2 months ago
I personally think reaching out to the PSP development team, as mentioned in option B, is crucial to see if a new cartridge version is in development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
2 months ago
The LINK cartridge issue seems like a tricky one. I'd start by reaching out to the PSP team to see if they have a controller-compatible version in the works.
upvoted 0 times
Kiley
1 months ago
C) Produce a proof of concept converting the most essential pipelines into controllers and integrate the cartridge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 months ago
B) Reach out to the PSP development team and ask if a new cartridge version that supports controllers is under development
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latanya
2 months ago
I agree with Sanda. Option C could also be helpful to produce a proof of concept before fully committing to the integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
2 months ago
I think option A is important because we need to estimate the effort and risk involved in converting the LINK cartridge.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel