Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) Exam - Topic 5 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Lindsey on Aug 06, 2023 at 06:45 AM

A Solution Architect is working with Northern Trail Outfitters' Sales and Services team. They are currently evaluating how many environments they need to procure. As part of a preliminary review, it was identified that although the different business units were happy working m separate environments, there is a requirement to know each other's transactions.

Which two requirements would make the Solution Architect recommend a Single org over a multi-org strategy?

Choose 2 answers

Get Premium Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
TY
Tyisha 11 months ago
Wait, can a single org really handle all that complexity?
YU
Yun 11 months ago
D is a big factor too, shared data is crucial!
GE
Genevive 12 months ago
C makes sense, but I’m not sure if it’s the best choice.
MA
Mariko 12 months ago
I think B is also super important for security.
GA
Galen 12 months ago
A is definitely a key reason for a single org!
IN
Ines 1 year ago
I was leaning towards option D as well, since having access to shared data seems crucial for understanding transactions between the units.
CO
Corrie 1 year ago
I feel like option C might be relevant since global case management could benefit from a single view of transactions across business units.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about security architecture. Maybe option B could be a good choice too?
EN
Ena 1 year ago
I think option A about collaboration is definitely a strong reason for a single org. It makes sense if they need to work together more closely.
CL
Clemencia 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about the correct way to define an empty element, but the options seem to have some variations in the syntax. I'll need to double-check my understanding of XML Schema to make sure I pick the right answer.
SA
Sarah 1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the role of the business analyst in defining the project scope. I'll carefully read through the options and select the one that best matches the description.
AN
Annett 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure consignment stock is owned by the supplier until it's consumed, so I'll go with option A.
BR
Brittni 1 year ago
Gotta be A and D for sure. Keeping everything in a single org just makes sense when you need that cross-business visibility and coordination. Plus, it's the only way to avoid those pesky 'silos' everyone's always complaining about.
LI
Lili 1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I reckon A and D are the way to go. Who needs collaboration and data sharing when you can just build your own little fiefdoms, am I right? *wink*
CH
Chantell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lili
B) Simple security architecture across lines of business
PE
Pete 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lili
I agree, having collaboration and shared data access would definitely make a single org strategy more appealing.
NA
Nan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lili
D) Access to shared lines of business data
LE
Leatha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lili
A) Collaboration between lines of business
HE
Helene 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd say B and C as well, since a single org would simplify the security architecture and enable global case management across the business units.
TY
Tyra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helene
B) Simple security architecture across lines of business
WA
Wava 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helene
A) Collaboration between lines of business
SH
Sharmaine 2 years ago
I think the answer is A and D. Having separate environments makes it hard for the different business units to collaborate and access each other's data, which is a key requirement here.
TE
Terrilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
Exactly, a single org would simplify the security architecture across different business units as well.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
That's true, a multi-org strategy would make it difficult to have a global case management system across lines of business.
DE
Denae 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
Yes, and it would also provide access to shared lines of business data, which is crucial for this scenario.
MA
Margart 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
I agree, having a single org would definitely improve collaboration between lines of business.
BE
Bernardine 2 years ago
I believe D is also crucial. Access to shared data can be a deciding factor for a Single org.
MA
Margery 2 years ago
I agree with Shaniqua. Collaboration and simple security architecture are important for a Single org.
SH
Shaniqua 2 years ago
I think A and B would make the Solution Architect recommend a Single org.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel