New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) Exam - Topic 5 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) Questions]

A Solution Architect is working with Northern Trail Outfitters' Sales and Services team. They are currently evaluating how many environments they need to procure. As part of a preliminary review, it was identified that although the different business units were happy working m separate environments, there is a requirement to know each other's transactions.

Which two requirements would make the Solution Architect recommend a Single org over a multi-org strategy?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tyisha
3 months ago
Wait, can a single org really handle all that complexity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
3 months ago
D is a big factor too, shared data is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
4 months ago
C makes sense, but I’m not sure if it’s the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
4 months ago
I think B is also super important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
A is definitely a key reason for a single org!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
4 months ago
I was leaning towards option D as well, since having access to shared data seems crucial for understanding transactions between the units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
4 months ago
I feel like option C might be relevant since global case management could benefit from a single view of transactions across business units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about security architecture. Maybe option B could be a good choice too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
5 months ago
I think option A about collaboration is definitely a strong reason for a single org. It makes sense if they need to work together more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about the correct way to define an empty element, but the options seem to have some variations in the syntax. I'll need to double-check my understanding of XML Schema to make sure I pick the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the role of the business analyst in defining the project scope. I'll carefully read through the options and select the one that best matches the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure consignment stock is owned by the supplier until it's consumed, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
9 months ago
Gotta be A and D for sure. Keeping everything in a single org just makes sense when you need that cross-business visibility and coordination. Plus, it's the only way to avoid those pesky 'silos' everyone's always complaining about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
9 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I reckon A and D are the way to go. Who needs collaboration and data sharing when you can just build your own little fiefdoms, am I right? *wink*
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
8 months ago
B) Simple security architecture across lines of business
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
8 months ago
I agree, having collaboration and shared data access would definitely make a single org strategy more appealing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
8 months ago
D) Access to shared lines of business data
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
9 months ago
A) Collaboration between lines of business
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helene
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd say B and C as well, since a single org would simplify the security architecture and enable global case management across the business units.
upvoted 0 times
Tyra
9 months ago
B) Simple security architecture across lines of business
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
10 months ago
A) Collaboration between lines of business
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharmaine
10 months ago
I think the answer is A and D. Having separate environments makes it hard for the different business units to collaborate and access each other's data, which is a key requirement here.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
9 months ago
Exactly, a single org would simplify the security architecture across different business units as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
That's true, a multi-org strategy would make it difficult to have a global case management system across lines of business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
9 months ago
Yes, and it would also provide access to shared lines of business data, which is crucial for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
10 months ago
I agree, having a single org would definitely improve collaboration between lines of business.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardine
11 months ago
I believe D is also crucial. Access to shared data can be a deciding factor for a Single org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
11 months ago
I agree with Shaniqua. Collaboration and simple security architecture are important for a Single org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
11 months ago
I think A and B would make the Solution Architect recommend a Single org.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel