New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) Exam - Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) has expanded rapidly in recent yean following a number of acquisitions. The new CMO wants to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs to luck-start a new targeted campaign in uC's mam Salesforce org. The acquired company would like to keep its Lead data because it enriches the Lead before it comes into Salesforce via third-party marketing tool and supports its direct sales channel. Beyond the Lead use case, both Salesforce orgs will remain completely independent from one another.

Which integration approach should a Solution Architect recommend between the UC mam org (the target org) and the acquired org (the source org)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Option D would involve discussing a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrating Leads to the target org after they are enriched in the source org. This would allow both Salesforce orgs to remain independent from each other, while also enabling UC to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs for its new targeted campaign. This would also preserve the value of Lead enrichment that happens in the source org via third-party marketing tool.

https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/b2bsolutionarchitect


by Talia at Jan 26, 2024, 05:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified B2B Solution Architect (Arch-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Charisse
3 months ago
Manual migration? No way, that’s just asking for errors!
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
3 months ago
I think B is solid, aligning teams is key for smooth migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
4 months ago
Surprised they want to migrate Leads daily, sounds like a lot of work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
4 months ago
I disagree, we should keep the source org's process intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
4 months ago
Option D seems the best, enriched data is always more valuable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
4 months ago
I feel like option B could work, but it might complicate things if the sales teams can't agree on the criteria for migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to consider the independence of the orgs. That might make option C less viable since it suggests deprecating the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but option A seems too manual for a long-term solution. Daily migrations could lead to inconsistencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of keeping data integrity, so maybe option D makes sense since it allows for enrichment before migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
5 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Coordinating with the teams on the criteria for migrating Leads seems like the most pragmatic approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different org scenarios. I'd need to clarify a few things before I could recommend a solid strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
5 months ago
Option D sounds like the best way to go. Migrating the enriched Leads makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'd want to really understand the requirements and constraints before deciding on an approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
The mnemonic is really clever, but I'm not sure I fully understand how it maps to the actual order of operations. I'll need to review that a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
5 months ago
I think the default format is JSON, I remember seeing that mentioned in the documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
5 months ago
I thought we covered something about it being false in one of our reviews, but now I'm confused since I see business alignment as a key factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
2 years ago
Wait, are we sure the acquired company is even going to go along with any of these options? They might just want to take their ball and go home. Gotta tread carefully here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
2 years ago
Option A is just plain lazy. Manual data migrations? Who has time for that these days? No, gotta go with one of the more automated options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
2 years ago
Option C is just asking for trouble. Deprecating the source org's lead collection capabilities? That's a recipe for disaster. Better to play nice and integrate the systems, not force a takeover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Keeping the lead enrichment process in the source org and then migrating the leads makes the most sense to me. Why disrupt a working system when you don't have to?
upvoted 0 times
Julie
2 years ago
Yeah, disrupting a working system can cause more harm than good. Option D is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
2 years ago
I think it's important to maintain the lead enrichment process in the source org before migrating them to the target org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to keep the lead enrichment process intact. Option D seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 years ago
Option D sounds like a good plan. It allows the source org to enrich the Leads before migrating them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
2 years ago
I agree with you. Option D seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
2 years ago
Option B seems like the best approach here. Migrating the leads after they're enriched in the source org maintains the value-add from the third-party tool, while still getting the leads into the target org. Seems like a balanced solution.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
2 years ago
Option B seems like the best approach here. Migrating the leads after they're enriched in the source org maintains the value-add from the third-party tool, while still getting the leads into the target org. Seems like a balanced solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
2 years ago
B) Discuss a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrate Leads to the target org before the enrichment within the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel