Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ARC-801 Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Universal Containers is in the process of implementing a CPQ and B2B Commerce solution. The Technology team hascompleted the development for the current sprint and is demonstrating the functionalities to the business stakeholders during their sprint demo. While demonstrating products and pricing, and Sync between B2B and CPQ when requesting a quote, the stakeholders make a new request to include tiered pricing and map it to discount schedules on CPQ.Which approach should a Solution Architect recommend while addressing the feedback from the stakeholders?
D) Add the request as a new user story to the product backlog, and further schedule a meeting for prioritization andgrooming.
A) Convey that this can be potentially picked up in the next sprint since the technical changes needed for this new user story are low effort.
B) Include it as a user story and accommodate it m the same sprint, since this is a feasible requirement and the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector is already set up.
C) Convey that it is not recommended to include M the initial MVP, since an extension is needed on the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector for the new requirement.

Salesforce ARC-801 Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-801 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All ARC-801 Questions]

Universal Containers is in the process of implementing a CPQ and B2B Commerce solution. The Technology team hascompleted the development for the current sprint and is demonstrating the functionalities to the business stakeholders during their sprint demo. While demonstrating products and pricing, and Sync between B2B and CPQ when requesting a quote, the stakeholders make a new request to include tiered pricing and map it to discount schedules on CPQ.

Which approach should a Solution Architect recommend while addressing the feedback from the stakeholders?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

CPQ B2B Commerce Connector is a tool that synchronizes data from CPQ product and pricing objects to B2B Commerce objects1.

CPQ uses discount schedules and B2B Commerce uses tiered pricing to handle volume-based pricing23.

The connector does not support mapping tiered pricing to discount schedules out of the box23.

The connector uses pricing from B2B Commerce to define the pricing on the generated quote lines by setting their Special Price fields4.

Incorporating new requirements, such as tiered pricing and mapping to discount schedules in CPQ, into an ongoing Salesforce CPQ and B2B Commerce project requires careful consideration of project scope, timelines, and resource availability. Adding the new requirement as a user story to the product backlog allows for a structured approach to evaluating its impact on the project. Scheduling a subsequent meeting for prioritization and grooming ensures that stakeholders can discuss the new requirement in detail, assess its feasibility, and decide on its inclusion in the project timeline. This approach aligns with agile project management best practices, allowing for flexibility in responding to new requirements while maintaining project focus and efficiency.


by Joni at Nov 19, 2025, 06:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARC-801 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Doyle
1 month ago
But we need to consider the MVP. Option C might be wise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
1 month ago
Option A could work too, low effort means quick win.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 months ago
True, but we might lose momentum if we wait.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
2 months ago
Option D sounds safer. Prioritize it later, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
2 months ago
I agree, but what if it complicates the sprint?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 months ago
I think option B is the best. It's feasible and we can handle it now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
2 months ago
Tiered pricing is a common request in CPQ setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
2 months ago
I think option C makes more sense, MVP first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
3 months ago
Wait, can they really fit that in this sprint? Seems tight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
3 months ago
I agree, prioritization is key here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
3 months ago
Sounds like they should just add it to the backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
4 months ago
Option D is too slow. The team should be able to handle this new requirement within the current sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
4 months ago
Haha, the stakeholders are really keeping the team on their toes with these new requests! Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
4 months ago
Option C is not a good idea. Delaying the implementation of this feature until the next sprint could disappoint the stakeholders and impact the project timeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
4 months ago
I agree with Option B. Accommodating the new requirement in the same sprint is the most efficient way to address the stakeholders' feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best approach. The requirement is feasible and the connector is already set up, so it should be doable within the current sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
4 months ago
I feel like including it in the same sprint, as in option B, could lead to rushed work. It might be better to add it to the backlog instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to prioritize new features. Option C makes sense if it’s not part of the MVP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
5 months ago
I’m not sure if the effort for tiered pricing is really low, like option A suggests. It seems like it could be more complex than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
5 months ago
I think option B is the best approach here. The connector is already set up, so it seems like a good opportunity to address the stakeholder's request and deliver value in the current sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
5 months ago
Option A sounds tempting, but I'm not sure the stakeholders will be happy with pushing this to the next sprint. If it's a feasible requirement, we should try to include it now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. Adding it to the backlog and prioritizing it later seems like the most prudent approach. We don't want to overcommit the team in the current sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how adding new user stories mid-sprint can disrupt the team's focus, so I’m leaning towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question mentions that technical changes are needed, so I'm not sure if it's really that low effort. Maybe option C is the safer bet to avoid scope creep?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
7 months ago
I think option B is the way to go here. The CPQ B2B Commerce Connector is already set up, so it seems like a feasible requirement that can be accommodated in the current sprint.
upvoted 0 times
Nancey
30 days ago
Let's push for it then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
I think we can handle it. It's a good opportunity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
6 months ago
But what if it complicates the sprint?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
6 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. It's feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
6 months ago
Yeah, the connector is ready. Why wait?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel