New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ARC-801 Exam - Topic 11 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-801 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 11
[All ARC-801 Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) wants to enhance the online purchase experience for its customers. The product and pricing information is managed in a separate ERP, while customer purchases are primarily triggered online through self-service. UC often offers promotions and discounts through various online seasonal events. UC wants the ability to provide customized quotes based on its relationship with the customer, as well as proactively process and monitor renewal and upgrade opportunities.

A Solution Architect has identified Sales Cloud, CPQ, Billing, and B2B Commerce as part of a potential multi-cloud solution.

Based on the above considerations, which option identifies the optimal data flow for this solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Deactivating products in Salesforce aligns with the ERP's status, maintaining data integrity without losing historical data. Marking related Opportunity and Quote data as inactive preserves historical records for reference without affecting active reporting, ensuring compliance with data retention policies and supporting accurate data analysis and decision-making.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Wava
2 months ago
A is good for promotions, but not sure about the data flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 months ago
I disagree, C keeps a single source of truth which is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
Option B seems solid, CPQ as the pricing master makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
3 months ago
I think B is the best choice for managing invoices effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
3 months ago
Surprised that D suggests using a Lightning component for billing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
3 months ago
I remember the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector being a key point in our studies. I think option D aligns with that, but I’m not 100% certain about the invoicing part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about where to manage promotions. I thought B2B Commerce was the best place for that, which makes me think option A could be correct, but I’m not confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where promotions were managed in CPQ. That makes me lean towards option B, but I can't recall all the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
4 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to have a single source of truth for pricing and product data. I think option C might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
4 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding how the different cloud services integrate and where the master data should reside. Option A or C seem like the best choices to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
Option D seems like a good balance, pushing pricing and product data to both CPQ and B2B Commerce while handling promotions and invoicing/billing separately. I think that could work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different ways the invoice and billing information can be handled. I'll need to research those options more to understand the implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
Option C looks like the most straightforward approach to me. Keeping a single source of truth for pricing and product data makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the data flow options and think through the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
10 months ago
Ah, the classic 'pass the data hot potato' strategy. I'm sure that'll work out great for their customers. Can't wait to see the 'Billing Bloopers' reel!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
10 months ago
I hear Universal Containers is considering changing their name to 'Leaky Containers' after this implementation. Gotta love those data silos!
upvoted 0 times
Cary
9 months ago
D) Pricing and Product data should be pushed from ERP to CPQ and from there to B2B Commerce via the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector. Promotions should be handled in B2B Commerce. Invoice and Billing should be maintained in Billing and presented on B2B Commerce via a Lightning component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
9 months ago
B) Pricing and Product data should be pushed from ERP to CPQ and from there to B2B Commerce via the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector. Promotions should be managed in CPQ as CPQ is the pricing master. Invoice and Billing should be managed in B2B Commerce and pushed to Billing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
9 months ago
A) Pricing and Product data should be pushed from ERP to B2B Commerce via the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector to CPQ. Promotions should be handled in B2B Commerce. Invoice and Billing should be maintained in Billing and surfaced on B2B Commerce via a Lightning component.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Golda
10 months ago
Option A is just a mess. Mixing up the responsibilities of CPQ and B2B Commerce? No thank you! I'll take one order of Option D, hold the bugs please.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
9 months ago
Yeah, Option A seems like it would cause more problems. Option D is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
9 months ago
I think Option D is the most logical choice. Let's keep it simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
9 months ago
Option A is definitely confusing. I agree with you, Option D seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ming
10 months ago
Option B looks good, but I'm a bit concerned about the complexity of pushing invoice and billing data from B2B Commerce to the Billing system. Seems like a potential point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
Stefania
8 months ago
Good point, option D does seem to have a more straightforward approach to handling the invoice and billing data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
8 months ago
Maybe we should consider option D instead, it seems to address the concerns about data flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
That's a valid point about the potential complexity of pushing invoice and billing data. Maybe there's a way to simplify that process.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
10 months ago
That's true, but I see your point about the potential complexity of pushing invoice and billing data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
10 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most efficient way to handle the data flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
10 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most efficient way to handle the data flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barney
11 months ago
I agree with Veronika, option A seems to have the most logical data flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Maintaining the single source of truth for pricing and product data is key, and handling promotions in B2B Commerce makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
11 months ago
Option D seems like the most logical choice. Separating pricing and promotions makes sense, and using a Lightning component to display billing info on the B2B Commerce site is a neat solution.
upvoted 0 times
Moon
9 months ago
It's important to have a clear data flow to ensure a smooth online purchase experience for customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
9 months ago
Using a Lightning component to display billing info on the B2B Commerce site is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
9 months ago
Having pricing and promotions separated can help streamline the process for both customers and UC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
10 months ago
I agree, Option D does seem like the best choice for this multi-cloud solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francesco
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel