Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ARC-801 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-801 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All ARC-801 Questions]

Mask Makers LLC has a traditional sales channel that uses an existing CPQ implementation to process orders. Customers frequently reorder previous purchases quickly and split the order into several deliveries for different locations. Additionally, these customers are given special pricing through Price Books m CPQ based on annual spending and other parameters. The customer currently makes their purchase by sending an email or calling their appointed sales representative, and then waits to receive a quote.

Mask Makers LLC wants to move away from this very manual and time-consuming process. The company wants to provide its customers with a personalized experience that is simplified and streamlined with existing special pricing visible and the option to self-serve- Mask Makers LLC would also like to deliver this within a short timeframe, as business must continue to grow.

Which design approach should a Solution Architect recommend to meet these requirements within the timeframe while adhering to best practices.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jesusa
1 days ago
I don't know, guys. All these options sound like a lot of work. Maybe we could just have the customers fax in their orders like it's the 90s? That's got to be faster than any of these fancy-schmancy solutions, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
6 days ago
Well, look at Mr. Fancy Pants over here with his 'best practices' and 'adhering to requirements'. I say we go with option D and just build a custom integration. What could possibly go wrong? *nervous laughter*
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
10 days ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't option C give us more flexibility in the long run? Allowing updates to go both ways between B2B Commerce and CPQ could really streamline the process. Just gotta make sure we have a solid plan for data syncing, that's all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
19 days ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one! I think option B might be the way to go - keeping CPQ as the master for products and pricing seems like the safest bet for a quick implementation. Plus, who needs all that extra 'bidirectional' complexity, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
10 hours ago
But wouldn't it be better to have bidirectional updates for Products and Pricing to ensure accuracy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
4 days ago
I agree, option B does seem like the safest bet for a quick implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Telma
19 days ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option A is more efficient in providing a personalized experience for customers within a short timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
23 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it allows us to build a custom integration to CPQ, keeping CPQ as the master for Products and Pricing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
25 days ago
I think option A is the best choice because it sets B2B Commerce as the Product and Pricing master, which will streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel