Salesforce ARC-101 Exam - Topic 8 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-101 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 8

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) use Salesforce to track leads, opportunities, and to capture order details. However, Salesforce isn't the system that holds or processes orders. After the order details are captured in Salesforce, an order must be created in the remote system, which manages the orders lifecylce. The Integration Architect for the project is recommending a remote system that will subscribe to the platform event defined in Salesforce.

Which integration pattern should be used for this business use case?

ARemote Call In

BRequest and Reply

CFire and Forget

DBatch Data Synchronization

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Fausto at Dec 12, 2022, 03:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARC-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Yuette

4 months ago

Fire and Forget makes sense, no need for a response.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharan

4 months ago

Surprised they’re not using Request and Reply for this!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

4 months ago

Wait, isn't Batch Data Synchronization more appropriate?

upvoted 0 times

...

Karl

4 months ago

Totally agree, it fits the use case perfectly!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

4 months ago

I think Fire and Forget is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

5 months ago

I have a vague memory that "Remote Call In" is used for direct calls, but I'm not confident it fits this scenario with the platform event.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think the "Batch Data Synchronization" pattern is more for syncing large data sets rather than real-time events.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulina

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like "Request and Reply" could also be relevant since it involves communication between systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

5 months ago

I remember studying the integration patterns, and I think "Fire and Forget" might be the right choice since it allows for asynchronous processing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albina

5 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is Orchestrated API, since that category can handle a series of API calls and combine them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

5 months ago

I think option C makes the most sense. If I recall correctly, getting approval from the supervisors before drafting the new language is generally a good step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paz

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards stakeholders being the most crucial input group. They definitely provide insights into user needs and expectations.

upvoted 0 times

...