Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ARC-101 Exam - Topic 8 Question 11 Discussion

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) use Salesforce to track leads, opportunities, and to capture order details. However, Salesforce isn't the system that holds or processes orders. After the order details are captured in Salesforce, an order must be created in the remote system, which manages the orders lifecylce. The Integration Architect for the project is recommending a remote system that will subscribe to the platform event defined in Salesforce.Which integration pattern should be used for this business use case?
C) Fire and Forget
A) Remote Call In
B) Request and Reply
D) Batch Data Synchronization

Salesforce ARC-101 Exam - Topic 8 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-101 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 8
[All ARC-101 Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) use Salesforce to track leads, opportunities, and to capture order details. However, Salesforce isn't the system that holds or processes orders. After the order details are captured in Salesforce, an order must be created in the remote system, which manages the orders lifecylce. The Integration Architect for the project is recommending a remote system that will subscribe to the platform event defined in Salesforce.

Which integration pattern should be used for this business use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Fausto at Dec 12, 2022, 03:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARC-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Yuette
10 months ago
Fire and Forget makes sense, no need for a response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
10 months ago
Surprised they’re not using Request and Reply for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
10 months ago
Wait, isn't Batch Data Synchronization more appropriate?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
11 months ago
Totally agree, it fits the use case perfectly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
11 months ago
I think Fire and Forget is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
11 months ago
I have a vague memory that "Remote Call In" is used for direct calls, but I'm not confident it fits this scenario with the platform event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the "Batch Data Synchronization" pattern is more for syncing large data sets rather than real-time events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like "Request and Reply" could also be relevant since it involves communication between systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
11 months ago
I remember studying the integration patterns, and I think "Fire and Forget" might be the right choice since it allows for asynchronous processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is Orchestrated API, since that category can handle a series of API calls and combine them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
11 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. If I recall correctly, getting approval from the supervisors before drafting the new language is generally a good step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards stakeholders being the most crucial input group. They definitely provide insights into user needs and expectations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel