New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ANC-301 Exam - Topic 6 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-301 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 6
[All ANC-301 Questions]

Universal Containers' CRM Analytics team is building a dashboard with two widgets, and the queries use different datasets.

1. List widget associated to the query "Type_2" and grouped by the dimension "Type" (multi-selection)

2. Donut chart widget associated to the query "Query_pie_3" and grouped by the dimension "Type"

The team wants any selection in the List widget to filter the Donut chart and vice vers

a. Users should be able to choose more than one Type (multi-selection).

What is the recommended way to accomplish the required filtering?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Dominga at Dec 10, 2024, 09:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANC-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lettie
3 months ago
Not sure if A will actually link those datasets properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
3 months ago
Wait, can we really filter both ways? That’s cool!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
3 months ago
C sounds too complicated for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
4 months ago
I think B might work better for interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
4 months ago
A is definitely the way to go for mapping fields!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
4 months ago
I feel like the 'Connect Data Sources' option could work, but I’m leaning towards the selection-based interaction since it seems more straightforward for filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
4 months ago
Setting up a result and selection-based interaction sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if it’s necessary for both queries in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to connect data sources, but I can't recall if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
I think we might need to use the selection-based interaction for the Donut chart, but I'm not entirely sure if that applies to both widgets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure which option is the best approach here. I'll need to carefully consider the pros and cons of each approach before deciding on the recommended solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I think the key is to use a selection-based interaction and apply it to both queries. That should give us the multi-selection functionality we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the different datasets being used for the two widgets. I'll need to make sure I understand how to properly connect them and set up the interaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
5 months ago
Okay, I think I understand the goal here. We need to make sure the selection in the list widget filters the donut chart, and vice versa. The multi-selection requirement adds an extra layer of complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the best way to set up the interaction between the two widgets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
1 year ago
C, no doubt about it. Anything less and those widgets are gonna be as useful as a chocolate teapot. Gotta get that two-way filtering working, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm tempted to go with B, but I have a feeling C is the way to go. Gotta love these tricky CRM Analytics exams!
upvoted 0 times
Na
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think setting up interactions for each query is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
1 year ago
But wouldn't using 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 year ago
I agree, setting up interactions for each query seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 year ago
I think C is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queenie
1 year ago
Ah, the ol' 'filter the filters' question. Classic CRM Analytics stuff. I'd go with C, it's the only one that mentions 'selection based interaction' which is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
1 year ago
I'm not too sure about this one. B sounds like it might work, but I feel like C is the more comprehensive solution. Guess I'll have to double-check the documentation.
upvoted 0 times
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of 'Query ple 3'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 year ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margart
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query seems like the way to go to make the widgets filter each other.
upvoted 0 times
Brandee
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 year ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrie
1 year ago
I think setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe creating a selection based Interaction and applying it to the query of 'Query_pie_3' is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
1 year ago
I think the recommended way is to use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel