Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ANC-301 Exam - Topic 6 Question 49 Discussion

Posted by Dominga on Dec 10, 2024 at 09:01 PM

Universal Containers' CRM Analytics team is building a dashboard with two widgets, and the queries use different datasets.

1. List widget associated to the query "Type_2" and grouped by the dimension "Type" (multi-selection)

2. Donut chart widget associated to the query "Query_pie_3" and grouped by the dimension "Type"

The team wants any selection in the List widget to filter the Donut chart and vice vers

a. Users should be able to choose more than one Type (multi-selection).

What is the recommended way to accomplish the required filtering?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium ANC-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
LE
Lettie 11 months ago
Not sure if A will actually link those datasets properly.
KA
Kattie 11 months ago
Wait, can we really filter both ways? That’s cool!
JE
Jenifer 12 months ago
C sounds too complicated for this setup.
BA
Basilia 12 months ago
I think B might work better for interactions.
BU
Buffy 1 year ago
A is definitely the way to go for mapping fields!
CA
Carlota 1 year ago
I feel like the 'Connect Data Sources' option could work, but I’m leaning towards the selection-based interaction since it seems more straightforward for filtering.
HA
Hannah 1 year ago
Setting up a result and selection-based interaction sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if it’s necessary for both queries in this case.
DO
Donte 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to connect data sources, but I can't recall if that's the best option here.
FL
Florinda 1 year ago
I think we might need to use the selection-based interaction for the Donut chart, but I'm not entirely sure if that applies to both widgets.
NO
Nobuko 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure which option is the best approach here. I'll need to carefully consider the pros and cons of each approach before deciding on the recommended solution.
LO
Lorrie 1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I think the key is to use a selection-based interaction and apply it to both queries. That should give us the multi-selection functionality we need.
CA
Carmen 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the different datasets being used for the two widgets. I'll need to make sure I understand how to properly connect them and set up the interaction.
CE
Celestina 1 year ago
Okay, I think I understand the goal here. We need to make sure the selection in the list widget filters the donut chart, and vice versa. The multi-selection requirement adds an extra layer of complexity.
GE
Germaine 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the best way to set up the interaction between the two widgets.
PH
Phyliss 2 years ago
C, no doubt about it. Anything less and those widgets are gonna be as useful as a chocolate teapot. Gotta get that two-way filtering working, am I right?
KI
Kimbery 2 years ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm tempted to go with B, but I have a feeling C is the way to go. Gotta love these tricky CRM Analytics exams!
NA
Na 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimbery
That's a good point, but I still think setting up interactions for each query is the way to go.
LA
Lashanda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimbery
But wouldn't using 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping be more efficient?
NI
Nickole 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimbery
I agree, setting up interactions for each query seems like the most logical choice.
FR
Franklyn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kimbery
I think C is the best option here.
QU
Queenie 2 years ago
Ah, the ol' 'filter the filters' question. Classic CRM Analytics stuff. I'd go with C, it's the only one that mentions 'selection based interaction' which is key here.
WE
Wendell 2 years ago
I'm not too sure about this one. B sounds like it might work, but I feel like C is the more comprehensive solution. Guess I'll have to double-check the documentation.
JA
Jacquelyne 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wendell
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
AR
Art 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wendell
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of 'Query ple 3'.
CH
Charlene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wendell
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
MA
Margart 2 years ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query seems like the way to go to make the widgets filter each other.
BR
Brandee 2 years ago
↳ replying to Margart
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
AL
Alex 2 years ago
↳ replying to Margart
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
BA
Barrie 2 years ago
I think setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query would be the best approach.
GU
Gussie 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe creating a selection based Interaction and applying it to the query of 'Query_pie_3' is the way to go.
HE
Helaine 2 years ago
I think the recommended way is to use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel