New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ANC-201 Exam - Topic 6 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 6
[All ANC-201 Questions]

Universal Containers' CRM Analytics team is building a dashboard with two widgets, and the queries use different datasets.

1. List widget associated to the query "Type_2" and grouped by the dimension "Type" (multi-selection)

2. Donut chart widget associated to the query "Query_pie_3" and grouped by the dimension "Type"

The team wants any selection in the List widget to filter the Donut chart and vice vers

a. Users should be able to choose more than one Type (multi-selection).

What is the recommended way to accomplish the required filtering?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Thomasena
3 months ago
Not sure if A will work as expected, seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
3 months ago
Wait, can we really filter across different datasets like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
3 months ago
C sounds too complicated for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
I think B might be better for interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
4 months ago
A is definitely the way to go for mapping fields!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m worried I might be mixing up the interactions from our last practice session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
4 months ago
I feel like setting up a result and selection-based interaction for each query could work, but I can't recall the exact steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to connect data sources. Could that be relevant here too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
5 months ago
I think we might need to use the selection-based interaction for the donut chart, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll start by mapping the fields between the two datasets, then set up the interaction as described in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
5 months ago
Based on the details provided, I think option C is the way to go. Setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query should give us the desired filtering behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the multi-selection requirement. I'll need to make sure I understand how that works before deciding on the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to set up the interaction between the two widgets so that any selection in the list widget filters the donut chart, and vice versa.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think through the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
1 year ago
I wonder if the 'Type' dimension is just a fancy way of saying 'flavor'. Maybe they're building a dashboard for an ice cream shop?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
1 year ago
Option B sounds good, but I'm a bit concerned about the typo in the question. Is it 'Query_pie_3' or 'Query_ple_3'? I hope it's not a trick question!
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
1 year ago
B) Option B sounds good, but I'm a bit concerned about the typo in the question. Is it 'Query_pie_3' or 'Query_ple_3'? I hope it's not a trick question!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
1 year ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
1 year ago
I think setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query might be too complex for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 year ago
Why not go for option A? Connecting the data sources seems like the most logical choice to me. I'd rather not overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
Option C seems like the most comprehensive approach. Setting up interactions for both queries will ensure a seamless filtering experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
I think option B is the way to go. It's a straightforward solution that will get the job done.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
1 year ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient way to achieve the required filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 year ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply it to the query of 'Query_pie_3'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dwight
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but creating a selection based Interaction and applying it to the query of 'Query_pie_3' could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
1 year ago
I agree with Merissa, that seems like the most efficient way to accomplish the required filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 year ago
I think the recommended way is to use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel