Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ANC-201 Exam - Topic 5 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 5
[All ANC-201 Questions]

The CRM Analytics consultant at Universal Containers has set data syncs and recipe runs back to back. However, they notice that the data syncs and recipe run jobs fail repeatedly. Upon investigation,

they realize the data syncs and recipes are tightly coupled which leads to too many runs being queued and eventually being canceled.

How should the consultant resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cherrie at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANC-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elin
34 minutes ago
I think option C is the best. Prioritizing smaller runs makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 days ago
Failure notifications are a must, but they won't fix the root issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
10 days ago
Wait, can they really increase concurrency limits? That sounds surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
16 days ago
Raising a case with Salesforce? Really? That seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
21 days ago
I think enabling priority scheduling is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
26 days ago
Sounds like a classic case of too much at once!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
1 month ago
This is why we can't have nice things. Too many cooks in the kitchen, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
1 month ago
C) Prioritizing the shorter/smaller runs is a smart move. Gotta keep that queue flowing smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
A) Increasing the concurrency limits sounds like the easiest fix, but it might just be a band-aid. Better to address the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
2 months ago
B) Notifications are crucial here. Gotta stay on top of those failures before they snowball.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
2 months ago
C) Definitely the way to go. Priority scheduling is the key to keeping those pesky data syncs and recipes in check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
2 months ago
I vaguely recall something about managing job queues. Maybe prioritizing smaller runs is the best approach to prevent cancellations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
3 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question about failure notifications. While they’re useful, I don’t think they actually solve the root problem here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think raising a case with Salesforce Support might be a bit extreme for this situation. There should be a way to resolve it internally first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
3 months ago
I remember we discussed how tightly coupled processes can lead to issues like this in class. It seems like enabling priority scheduling could help manage the runs better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Enabling priority scheduling seems like the most straightforward solution to prevent the data syncs and recipes from getting too tightly coupled and causing problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
3 months ago
Priority scheduling sounds like the way to go. That'll help ensure the system is running as efficiently as possible and minimize the risk of jobs getting stuck or canceled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
3 months ago
Definitely set up failure notifications so I can stay on top of this issue. That way, I can jump in and fix things as soon as the jobs start failing, instead of waiting for everything to grind to a halt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we be raising a case with Salesforce Support to increase the concurrency limits? Or is there a way to handle this within the org settings?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I think the best approach here would be to enable priority scheduling to queue the shorter or smaller runs first. That way, the longer or larger runs don't get stuck in the queue and cause everything to fail.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel