New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ANC-201 Exam - Topic 5 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 5
[All ANC-201 Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) has a dashboard in CRM Analytics with forecasting dat

a. One widget is a compare table using the timeseries function showing the quarterly forecast. However, CK is interested in enhancing the dashboard with a weekly forecast per customer.

How should CK achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vernell
3 months ago
Wait, can we really get accurate weekly forecasts? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, it’s the most logical choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
3 months ago
C looks interesting, but why use Y-M-D instead of Y-M-W?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
4 months ago
I think A is better, Opportunity Name gives more detail on sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
4 months ago
Option B seems right, using Account Name makes sense for customer-level forecasts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the partitioning. I thought Opportunity Name was more common, but now I’m not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it mentions the @ timeseries, which seems relevant for detailed timeframes like weekly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
4 months ago
I think we did a similar question where we had to specify the date columns. I feel like Y-M-D might be the right choice for weekly forecasts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
5 months ago
I remember we practiced using SAQL queries, but I'm not sure if we should use Opportunity Name or Account Name for the partition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think option B is the way to go. Partitioning by Account Name and using Y-M-W for the date should give us the weekly forecast per customer that the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
5 months ago
I'm not too familiar with SAQL, but it seems like option A with the Opportunity Name partition could also work to get the weekly forecast per customer. I'll have to double-check the details on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to use the timeseries function in SAQL and partition by the customer/account to get the weekly forecast per customer. Option B seems like the right approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the Y-M-W and Y-M-D date options. Does Y-M-W give a true weekly forecast, or is Y-M-D the better choice here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like it's asking for a weekly forecast per customer. I think option B with the SAQL query using Account Name as the partition and Y-M-W as the Date Cols could work for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to review my notes on container security to try to figure out the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
5 months ago
Okay, the key here is to update the username without losing the application history. I think the admin portal solution is a good starting point, but I'll need to double-check if that meets the stated goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
5 months ago
RADIUS seems out of place here; I can't recall it being an Enterprise CA option like the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the capabilities of each service to determine which one can handle both ingesting and storing the data in Parquet format.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'll just need to carefully read through the options and choose the three most desirable characteristics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
10 months ago
Weekly forecasts? Sounds like a recipe for information overload if you ask me. But hey, if the client wants it, option C is the way to go. Time to get your data-crunching pants on!
upvoted 0 times
Laquita
8 months ago
Time to crunch some numbers and make that dashboard even better!
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
8 months ago
Agreed, it might be a lot of data to handle, but that's what the client wants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
8 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for adding a weekly forecast per customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
10 months ago
Weekly forecasts? Yikes, that's going to be a big change. I think option A is the way to go - the Opportunity Name will give us the customer-level detail we need.
upvoted 0 times
Viola
9 months ago
Weekly forecasts will definitely be a big change, but option A seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
9 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for enhancing the dashboard with a weekly forecast per customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
10 months ago
I agree, using Opportunity Name as the partition will give us the customer-level detail we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
Weekly forecasts, huh? That's going to be a lot of data to crunch. Option C looks like the way to go - Y-M-D should give us the granularity we need.
upvoted 0 times
Devorah
8 months ago
Great choice! Y-M-D will provide the weekly forecast per customer that Cloud Kicks is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
9 months ago
Let's go with Option C then. It seems like the best choice for enhancing the dashboard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
9 months ago
I agree, weekly forecasts will require a lot of data to crunch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
9 months ago
Option C looks good. Y-M-D will definitely give us the granularity we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
11 months ago
But using Opportunity Name as the partition makes more sense for a weekly forecast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
11 months ago
Weekly forecasts per customer? Sounds like a lot of work, but it could be useful. I'd go with option B to keep things simple and focus on the Account Name.
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
10 months ago
User2: Yeah, keeping it simple with Account Name makes sense for weekly forecasts per customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
10 months ago
User1: I agree, option B seems like the best choice to focus on the Account Name.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
11 months ago
I think CK should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel