New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ANC-201 Exam - Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 4
[All ANC-201 Questions]

After the initial creation of a story, the first story insight explains 93% of the variation of the outcome variable. This is unusual high?

What is the most likely multiple for this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Loren at Nov 21, 2023, 12:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANC-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jacinta
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that 93%? Seems off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
3 months ago
I agree, outliers could skew the results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
4 months ago
I thought too many rows would dilute the insights?
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
4 months ago
Definitely sounds like data leakage to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
4 months ago
93% is super high for a first insight!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused; I thought having too many rows was usually a good thing. Does that really relate to the outcome variable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
4 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we practiced a similar one where data leakage was mentioned. Could it be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
4 months ago
I think we covered something about outliers affecting the results, so maybe option C is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
5 months ago
I remember discussing how a high percentage like 93% could indicate overfitting, but I'm not sure which option relates to that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
5 months ago
Whoa, 93%? That's crazy high. My first thought is that the dataset must have multiple dominant values that are skewing the results. I'll need to dig into the data distribution and look for any potential issues there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. If the first story insight explains 93% of the variation, that's pretty unusual. I'm wondering if the dataset has too many rows or if there are too many outliers that are driving that high R-squared. I'll need to evaluate the data quality carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
5 months ago
This is an interesting one. I'm not sure if the high R-squared is due to data leakage or just a really strong relationship in the data. I'll need to analyze the dataset more closely to figure out the most likely explanation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
5 months ago
Hmm, 93% seems really high for the first story insight. I'll need to think carefully about what that could mean. Maybe the dataset has some dominant values or outliers that are skewing the results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Adaptation is about how organisms change to fit their environment. These team activities are more about communication and process improvement, not adaptation. I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key is to focus on the SLA with the cloud provider. That should give me the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
5 months ago
This question is a bit tricky; I believe the buy-sell agreement is designed to provide liquidity, but wasn't there something about shares possibly not counting after a death?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we covered decision operations in class, but I can't quite recall all the details. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
I'm confident this is true. The transparency of blockchain makes the data more vulnerable if the encryption is broken.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel