New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ADX-211 Exam - Topic 9 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-211 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 9
[All ADX-211 Questions]

The sales department has asked to limit access to the Amount field on the Opportunity to only tnose users. In the sales department and on the executtve team, Northern Trail Outfitters uses six custom profiles including Sales User. Marketing user, call Center user. Executive User Sales Manager user, ana call Center Manager user. Field level access is removed from three or the profiles In the sandbox.

What action should an administrator take to make sure this change is in production?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Quentin
4 months ago
Not sure if D covers everything needed for the profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
4 months ago
I'm surprised they didn't mention a change set earlier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
4 months ago
Wait, why not just go with B? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
4 months ago
Definitely agree with C, makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
4 months ago
I think option C is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether we need to include all profiles or just the ones that need changes. I hope I remember the right approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to limit field access. I think deploying a change set might be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
5 months ago
I think manually restricting access for each profile is too time-consuming, especially if we have to do it in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
I remember we talked about change sets in class, but I'm not sure if I should deploy all profiles or just the ones with restricted access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
5 months ago
Okay, I know stacks use the LIFO (last-in, first-out) principle, so statement C is incorrect. The push operation does add a new element to the top of the stack, so statement A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by some of these options. SD-WAN and BGP don't seem directly relevant to the problems described. I think I'll focus on the more obvious choices like network segmentation, PAM, and remote access VPN. Those should help address the core security gaps that led to the ransomware incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. Since the restaurant is an established depositor, the bank should just provide an unlimited exemption for their cash deposits and withdrawals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. The customer would need to consider the control balance during the Discovery and Strategy stage, since that's when they're defining the service integration approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel