Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ADX-211 Exam - Topic 8 Question 71 Discussion

Cloud Kicks has just released a new Process Builder on the Account in production. The end users keep getting error messages that prevent them from completing their updates to the Account.Which three things should the administrator do to resolve this issue?Choose 3 answers
A) Review the Error Email for the Process Builder and rectify the issues. and C) Deactivate the Process Builder in production. and E) Fix the Process Builder in a sandbox and migrate the change to production.
B) Manually make the updates to the Account as the logged-in user.
D) Have the users refresh the Account page so they get the current Process Builder.

Salesforce ADX-211 Exam - Topic 8 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-211 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 8
[All ADX-211 Questions]

Cloud Kicks has just released a new Process Builder on the Account in production. The end users keep getting error messages that prevent them from completing their updates to the Account.

Which three things should the administrator do to resolve this issue?

Choose 3 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, E

To resolve the issue with the Process Builder, the administrator should do the following steps:

Review the Error Email for the Process Builder and rectify the issues. The error email contains information about what caused the error and how to fix it.

Deactivate the Process Builder in production. This will prevent further errors from occurring while the administrator fixes the Process Builder.

Fix the Process Builder in a sandbox and migrate the change to production. This will ensure that the Process Builder is tested and validated before deploying it to production. Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.flow_troubleshoot_error_email.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.flow_deploy.htm&type=5


by Gaston at Jul 04, 2025, 02:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ADX-211 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jani
8 months ago
Fixing it in a sandbox sounds like the best plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
9 months ago
Refreshing the page won't solve the underlying issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
9 months ago
I think deactivating it is a bit extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
9 months ago
Wait, can you really just deactivate it in production? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
9 months ago
Definitely check the error email first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
10 months ago
I recall that fixing the Process Builder in a sandbox and migrating it to production is a best practice. It ensures that we don't disrupt users while we troubleshoot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
10 months ago
I feel like manually updating the Account isn't a long-term solution. It might just be a workaround, but it doesn't really fix the underlying problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think deactivating the Process Builder might be a temporary fix. We did a similar question where we had to decide whether to deactivate a flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
10 months ago
I remember we discussed checking the error emails for Process Builders in class. That seems like a good first step to identify the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good strategy here. I'll start by reviewing the error email, then try to fix the Process Builder in a sandbox, and finally migrate the change to production. Hopefully, that will resolve the end-user issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
11 months ago
Refreshing the Account page to get the current Process Builder? I'm not sure that would actually resolve the issue. Seems like we need to dig a bit deeper to find the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
11 months ago
Deactivating the Process Builder in production is an option, but that might not be the best approach. I think I'd try to fix the issue in a sandbox first and then migrate the change to production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. Should I just manually make the updates to the Account as the logged-in user? That seems like a quick fix, but I'm not sure if that's the best long-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward issue with the new Process Builder. I'd start by reviewing the error email to identify and fix any issues in the Process Builder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 year ago
I'm a bit surprised that manual updates are even an option. That's just asking for trouble and inconsistency. Let's stick to the proper channels, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
Haha, refreshing the page? That's like trying to fix a flat tire by rolling down the window and yelling at it. Definitely not the solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
Deactivating the Process Builder in production? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. C'mon, we need to do this properly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
1 year ago
Option A and E are the way to go. You gotta fix that Process Builder and get it right in the sandbox before pushing it to production.
upvoted 0 times
Ashleigh
12 months ago
E) Fix the Process Builder in a sandbox and migrate the change to production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
12 months ago
A) Review the Error Email for the Process Builder and rectify the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paz
1 year ago
I believe fixing the Process Builder in a sandbox and migrating the change to production is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
I agree with Ardella. Deactivating the Process Builder in production could also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 year ago
I think we should review the Error Email for the Process Builder and fix the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel