Salesforce ADX-211 Exam - Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-211 exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 3

Ursa Major Solar uses the custom object Product Development to track Ideas R&D is wording on. A former administrator added the custom object Potential Name with a lookup to Product Development to allow R&D to track names under consideration for those product. The R&D manager recently ran a record and noticed several potential names where the relationship to the Product Development record was missing. The current administrator needs to change this relationship to master detail to ensure a potential name only exists when there is product development.

Which two options are available for altering the existing Potential Name records for the deployment of this change to be successful?

Choose 2 answers

AMove any Potential Name records with blank lookup fields to the recycle bin.

BAssign any Potential Name records with blank lookup fields to an existing record from Product Development.

CRemove any existing data in the lookup field n Potential Name records

DRemove the lookup field from the page layout so the data is maintained without changes.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

by Lawrence at Jul 21, 2022, 06:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ADX-211 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Raymon

4 months ago

Not sure if B is the best choice, what if we lose data?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

4 months ago

C won't help with the master-detail change.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

4 months ago

Surprised that removing the lookup field is an option!

upvoted 0 times

...

Phyliss

4 months ago

I think A is a bit extreme, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

4 months ago

B is definitely the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lera

5 months ago

I recall that removing data from the lookup field could lead to issues, so I think we should focus on options B and A for this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

5 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to clean up records before changing relationships. Removing the lookup field entirely seems risky, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like moving records to the recycle bin might not be the best approach. What if we need those names later?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how master-detail relationships require all child records to be linked, so I think option B makes sense to assign those blank records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beth

5 months ago

Option B looks good to me. Including only the needed form in a managed solution should keep things simple and prevent any issues with new forms being created.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure which two options would be the most helpful for the initial information-gathering steps. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the namespace prefixes in the answer choices. I'll need to make sure I understand how namespaces work in XSLT before I can answer this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

5 months ago

Okay, let me break this down. The question says the developer is adding support for a new language, and the locale code is "de". So the resource bundles should go in the templates/de folder, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

5 months ago

I keep thinking about a practice question that mentioned REST's stateless nature. I feel like the unencrypted option is a trap here since it doesn't really define REST itself.

upvoted 0 times

...