Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ADX-211 Exam - Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Posted by Lawrence on Jul 21, 2022 at 06:35 PM

Ursa Major Solar uses the custom object Product Development to track Ideas R&D is wording on. A former administrator added the custom object Potential Name with a lookup to Product Development to allow R&D to track names under consideration for those product. The R&D manager recently ran a record and noticed several potential names where the relationship to the Product Development record was missing. The current administrator needs to change this relationship to master detail to ensure a potential name only exists when there is product development.

Which two options are available for altering the existing Potential Name records for the deployment of this change to be successful?

Choose 2 answers

Suggested Answer: A, B

Get Premium ADX-211 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
RA
Raymon 12 months ago
Not sure if B is the best choice, what if we lose data?
RA
Rachael 12 months ago
C won't help with the master-detail change.
WE
Wenona 12 months ago
Surprised that removing the lookup field is an option!
PH
Phyliss 1 year ago
I think A is a bit extreme, though.
MI
Mitsue 1 year ago
B is definitely the way to go!
LE
Lera 1 year ago
I recall that removing data from the lookup field could lead to issues, so I think we should focus on options B and A for this one.
BE
Berry 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to clean up records before changing relationships. Removing the lookup field entirely seems risky, though.
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like moving records to the recycle bin might not be the best approach. What if we need those names later?
MA
Marguerita 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how master-detail relationships require all child records to be linked, so I think option B makes sense to assign those blank records.
BE
Beth 1 year ago
Option B looks good to me. Including only the needed form in a managed solution should keep things simple and prevent any issues with new forms being created.
HE
Hermila 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure which two options would be the most helpful for the initial information-gathering steps. I'll need to think this through carefully.
CR
Cristal 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the namespace prefixes in the answer choices. I'll need to make sure I understand how namespaces work in XSLT before I can answer this.
DA
Daniel 1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. The question says the developer is adding support for a new language, and the locale code is "de". So the resource bundles should go in the templates/de folder, right?
BE
Belen 1 year ago
I keep thinking about a practice question that mentioned REST's stateless nature. I feel like the unencrypted option is a trap here since it doesn't really define REST itself.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel