Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ADX-201 Exam - Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

The Client services and customer support teams share the same profile but have differentpermission sets. The Custom Object Retention related list needs to be restricted to the client services teamon the Lightning record page layout.What should the administrator use to fulfil this request?
B) Page Layout Assignment and D) Record Type Assignment
A) Sharing settings
C) Component Visibility

Salesforce ADX-201 Exam - Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-201 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 6
[All ADX-201 Questions]

The Client services and customer support teams share the same profile but have different

permission sets. The Custom Object Retention related list needs to be restricted to the client services teamon the Lightning record page layout.

What should the administrator use to fulfil this request?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Two considerations when installing a managed package in a sandbox are:

The installation link has to be modified to test.salesforce.com, because the default installation link points to login.salesforce.com which is for production orgs. To install a package in a sandbox org, the administrator has to replace login with test in the installation URL before clicking it.

The package will be removed any time the sandbox is refreshed, because refreshing a sandbox replaces its current data and metadata with those from its source org. If the source org does not have the package installed, then the sandbox will lose it after refresh. Any metadata changes to the package do not have to be recreated in production, because they are preserved during upgrades unless overwritten by the package developer. Install for Admins Only is not the only install option available; there are also Install for All Users and Install for Specific Profiles options. Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.distribution_installing_packages.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.data_sandbox_implementation_tips.htm&type=5


by Jacquelyne at Sep 13, 2024, 04:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ADX-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Avery
9 months ago
Sharing settings won't help here, wrong approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
10 months ago
Page Layout Assignment could work too, but not as flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
10 months ago
Wait, can you really use Component Visibility for that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
10 months ago
Totally agree, it makes sense to restrict access that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
10 months ago
I think Component Visibility is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards component visibility too, but I wonder if record type assignment could play a role in this scenario? It’s a bit confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
11 months ago
This question feels familiar! I think I practiced a similar one where we had to use sharing settings, but that seems more about record access than page layout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think page layout assignment is more about what fields are visible rather than restricting a related list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
11 months ago
I remember something about component visibility being used to control what different teams can see on a Lightning page. That might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
11 months ago
I've got a good feeling about Sharing settings for this one. The requirement to restrict the related list to just the client services team points to using sharing to control access, in my opinion. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The different permission sets for the teams make me think it could be a Record Type Assignment, but I'm not totally sure. I'll have to review the options again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question says we need to restrict the related list to the client services team, so I'm thinking Component Visibility might be the way to go. That would allow us to control the visibility of that specific component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between Sharing settings and Page Layout Assignment. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
11 months ago
This one seems straightforward. I think the answer is Sharing settings, since we need to restrict the Custom Object Retention related list to the client services team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
1 year ago
I'm going with C) Component Visibility. It's the only option that makes sense for restricting access to a specific related list. *chuckles* Unless the admin wants to just give the client services team x-ray vision to see through the page layout.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalyn
1 year ago
D) Record Type Assignment is not relevant in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
C) Component Visibility is the best option to restrict access to the related list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
1 year ago
B) Page Layout Assignment is more about assigning layouts to profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
A) Sharing settings wouldn't work for this specific request.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
1 year ago
A) Sharing settings? Come on, that's for controlling access to the whole object, not just a specific related list. Gotta be one of the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
D) Record Type Assignment? Really? That doesn't sound right. This is about controlling access to a specific related list, not managing record types.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaunda
1 year ago
B) Page Layout Assignment
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
C) Component Visibility
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
1 year ago
B) Page Layout Assignment
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
A) Sharing settings
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. My initial thought was B) Page Layout Assignment, but now I'm second-guessing myself. Tough call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
1 year ago
I believe Component Visibility could also be a good option to restrict the related list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
1 year ago
I agree with Dorothy. Page Layout Assignment makes sense for this request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 year ago
I think C) Component Visibility is the way to go here. We need to restrict access to that specific related list, and that's what Component Visibility is for.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
1 year ago
B) Page Layout Assignment
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 year ago
A) Sharing settings
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
I think the administrator should use Page Layout Assignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 year ago
I believe Sharing settings could also be a possible solution for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 year ago
I agree with Ria, Page Layout Assignment makes sense for this request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
1 year ago
I think the administrator should use Page Layout Assignment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel