New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ADX-201 Exam - Topic 3 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-201 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 3
[All ADX-201 Questions]

The administrator at Universal Container has created two objects: Containers_c Purchase_c, Management has requested that all container records display on purchase records in Salesforce.

Which type of relationship between Containers_c and Purchase_c should satisfy the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Johnathon
3 months ago
Wait, can you really display all container records on purchase records? That sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
3 months ago
Not sure about that, but Master-detail seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
3 months ago
Roll-Up Summary fields only work with Master-detail relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
4 months ago
I think a Lookup field could work too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
4 months ago
Definitely a Master-detail field for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards the Master-detail option too, but I wonder if a Formula field could somehow display the records as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like a Lookup field could work, but it might not show all the container records as needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Roll-Up Summary fields being used for aggregating data. Would that apply here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
5 months ago
I think the relationship might be a Master-detail field since it allows for a strong connection between the two objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
5 months ago
I think the key here is the requirement to display container records on purchase records. That suggests a master-detail relationship, where the containers would be the detail records and the purchases would be the master records. The container records would then be displayed on the purchase records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. A roll-up summary field is used to aggregate data from related records, but that doesn't seem to fit the requirement here. A formula field is used to calculate a value, which also doesn't seem relevant. I'm leaning towards either a lookup or master-detail relationship, but I'll need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions displaying container records on purchase records, so I'm wondering if a lookup or master-detail relationship might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward relationship question. I'll need to think through the different types of relationships and which one would best satisfy the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
1 year ago
Master-detail field all the way! It's the perfect solution for this problem. Unless, of course, the containers are made of some kind of magical material that defies the laws of physics.
upvoted 0 times
Tracie
1 year ago
Roll-Up Summary field could work too, but Master-detail field seems like the best fit for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
1 year ago
I agree, Master-detail field creates a parent-child relationship which is perfect for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
1 year ago
Master-detail field is definitely the way to go. It will make sure all container records display on purchase records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marica
1 year ago
Roll-Up Summary field? Hmm, I don't think that's the right approach for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
1 year ago
I'm not sure. Maybe Lookup field could also work if we just want to link the two objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
1 year ago
Lookup field? Really? That doesn't sound like it would satisfy the requirement at all.
upvoted 0 times
Carman
1 year ago
Yeah, a Master-detail field would create a stronger relationship between the two objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
1 year ago
I think a Master-detail field would be the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
1 year ago
C) Master-detail field
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
1 year ago
A) Roll-Up Summary field
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shizue
1 year ago
I'm not sure a formula field would work, since we need to actually display the container records, not just calculate some value.
upvoted 0 times
Ronnie
1 year ago
I think a lookup field might not be the best choice since it doesn't establish a parent-child relationship like master-detail does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
1 year ago
D) Lookup field
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
I agree, a roll-up summary field would be the best option to display all container records on purchase records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
C) Master-detail field
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 year ago
A) Roll-Up Summary field
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
1 year ago
The Master-Detail field seems like the obvious choice here. It would allow the container records to display on the purchase records.
upvoted 0 times
Yolande
1 year ago
D) Lookup field
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
1 year ago
C) Master-detail field
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
1 year ago
B) Formula field
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
A) Roll-Up Summary field
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bok
1 year ago
I agree with Buck. Master-detail field will ensure all container records display on purchase records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
I think the relationship should be Master-detail field.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel