Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Qlik QV12SA Exam - Topic 7 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Qlik's QV12SA exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 7
[All QV12SA Questions]

An organization plans to purchase CALs for a new QlikView Server

Users are grouped into three categories based on how they will access and use QlikView

1. Two hundred and twenty users access a single application infrequently for short periods of time with a maximum of five concurrent users.

2. Five users work standard business hours and have access to four QlikView documents, each with a maximum of five concurrent users.

3. Two users are developers and only work on one QlikView document at a time. The developers must be able to use the Qlikview Desktop Client for development and the AccessPoint for testing.

Which is the most cost effective CAL configuration to meet the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gary at Jan 23, 2026, 03:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium QV12SA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mammie
16 days ago
Sounds right, but I'm surprised they need so many CALs for just a few users!
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
21 days ago
I think the infrequent users might be better off with Named CALs too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
26 days ago
Wait, can you really have that many concurrent users with just Document CALs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
1 month ago
Totally agree, Named CALs for the developers and Document CALs for the others!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
1 month ago
Looks like you need a mix of Named and Document CALs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 month ago
I bet the developers are just going to use the QlikView Desktop Client to play Solitaire anyway. Why not just get them the Analyzer CALs and call it a day?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
The question mentions a maximum of 5 concurrent users for each group, so the Analyzer CALs should be sufficient for the 220 infrequent users. The Professional CALs for the 5 standard users and 2 developers makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I wonder if the organization could get away with just using the Analyzer CALs for everyone to save some money. After all, who needs fancy features when you can just stare at the data, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 months ago
The developers definitely need the Professional CALs to access the QlikView Desktop Client and AccessPoint. But for the other users, I'm not sure if the Analyzer CALs would be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
2 months ago
I think the most cost-effective CAL configuration would be to use the Analyzer CALs for the 220 infrequent users and the Professional CALs for the 5 standard users and 2 developers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
2 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice scenario we did on CAL configurations. I think we might need a mix of User and Document CALs to cover all groups effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
2 months ago
For the developers, I believe they need Professional CALs, but I’m a bit confused about how that fits with the other users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
3 months ago
I think the first group might need a Document CAL since they access infrequently, but I'm not certain about the second group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
3 months ago
I remember something about the different types of CALs, but I'm not sure which ones apply here. Maybe the user types will help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
4 months ago
The developers are the trickiest part. They need both the Desktop Client and the AccessPoint, so I'll have to account for that in my CAL configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
4 months ago
The second group of 5 users with access to 4 documents is a bit more complex. I'll need to calculate the total concurrent users across those 4 docs and see what CAL type works best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
4 months ago
Alright, I'm going to start by looking at the first group of 220 users who access a single app infrequently. Sounds like I can use the concurrent user limit to optimize the CALs for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. We've got three user groups with different usage patterns. I think I need to figure out the minimum number of CALs required for each group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the different user groups and their requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel