New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pure Storage Portworx-Enterprise-Professional Exam - Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's Portworx-Enterprise-Professional exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 1
[All Portworx-Enterprise-Professional Questions]

An infrastructure admin wants to restrict installing Portworx in two nodes.

What label does the node need to have?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Restricting Portworx installation on certain Kubernetes nodes is achieved by labeling those nodes with px/enabled=false. This label signals the Portworx Operator or installer to exclude these nodes from Portworx deployment. This allows admins to reserve nodes for other workloads or prevent Portworx from running on unsupported hardware. The label px/service=stop or px/storage-node=false are not recognized controls in the Portworx installation process. Portworx deployment guides consistently document the use of px/enabled=false for node exclusion, providing a simple, declarative way to control cluster topology and resource assignment during Portworx installations and upgradesPure Storage Portworx Deployment Guidesource.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Juliann
9 hours ago
Totally agree with A!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
6 days ago
I thought it was C) px/storage-node=false?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
11 days ago
A) px/enabled=false is the right label.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
16 days ago
The correct answer is obvious. Portworx needs to know which nodes are the storage nodes, so C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
21 days ago
Haha, these options are like a bad game of "Guess the Portworx Label"! I'll take C for $500, Alex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
26 days ago
B) px/service=stop? Really? That's like telling the admin to turn off the whole service, not just restrict it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 month ago
A) px/enabled=false sounds like it would disable Portworx entirely, not just restrict it to two nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 month ago
C) px/storage-node=false is the correct answer. Portworx requires a specific label to identify the storage nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards px/enabled=false, but I wish I had reviewed the node labeling more before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 months ago
I feel like px/service=stop could be the right answer, but I can't recall if that's specifically for stopping services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to label nodes for a service. Could it be px/storage-node=false?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking for the label we need to apply to the nodes where we don't want Portworx installed. I'm going to go with C) px/storage-node=false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
2 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy for this. Based on the options provided, I think the answer is C) px/storage-node=false. That should tell Portworx not to install on those nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
2 months ago
I think the label might be something like px/enabled=false, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. What exactly does "restrict installing Portworx" mean? Do we want to prevent Portworx from being installed on certain nodes, or is there something else going on?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
3 months ago
I agree, A seems right. It clearly indicates no Portworx.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is finding the right label to apply to the nodes where we don't want Portworx installed. I'll need to review the Portworx documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
3 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a Kubernetes-related question. I'll need to think about the Portworx labels and how to restrict installation to specific nodes.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
3 months ago
Nah, that’s not the right one for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel