Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA Exam 8010 Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's 8010 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 2
[All 8010 Questions]

Credit exposure for derivatives is measured using

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Current replacement values are a very poor measure of the credit exposure from a derivative contract, because the future value of these instruments is unpredictable, ie is stochastic, and the range of values it can take increases the further ahead in the future we look. Therefore it is common for credit exposures for derivatives to be measured using forward looking exposure profiles, which are distributions of the expected value of the derivative at the time horizon for which credit risk is being measured. To be conservative, a high enough quintile of this distribution is taken as the 'loan equivalent value' of the derivative as the exposure. Choice 'c' is the correct answer.

The notional value of derivative contracts generally tends to be quite high and unrelated to their economic value or the counterparty exposure. Therefore notional value is irrelevant.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tiara
2 hours ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think notional value was mentioned as a measure, but it might not capture the full risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
6 days ago
I think credit exposure is often measured using the current replacement value, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
11 days ago
The current replacement value seems like the most direct way to measure credit exposure. It's the amount the bank would have to pay to replace the contract if the counterparty defaulted. That seems like the key risk factor to focus on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
17 days ago
I'm a little confused on the difference between current replacement value and forward-looking exposure profile. Aren't they both trying to get at the potential future losses? I'll have to review my notes on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
22 days ago
Okay, I remember discussing this in class. The current replacement value is the amount it would cost to replace the derivative contract at the current market rates. That makes sense as the measure of credit exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
28 days ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know credit exposure has to do with the potential future losses, but I'm not sure if that's the same as the current replacement value. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
1 month ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the current replacement value is the key metric for measuring credit exposure on derivatives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm stuck between A and C. Maybe I should roll a die to decide - that's how Wall Street traders make their big decisions, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
3 months ago
D) Standard normal distribution? Really? That's completely irrelevant to measuring credit exposure for derivatives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
3 months ago
I'm going to go with B) Notional value of the derivative. It's a simple and straightforward measure of the exposure.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
1 month ago
I agree, it's a commonly used measure for credit exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
2 months ago
I think B) Notional value of the derivative is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moira
4 months ago
C) Forward looking exposure profile of the derivative sounds like the right answer to me. It's more comprehensive than just the current value.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
3 months ago
Yeah, it takes into account potential future changes in value, not just the current value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
3 months ago
I agree, the forward looking exposure profile gives a better understanding of the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
4 months ago
I think it could also be the forward looking exposure profile of the derivative, as it takes into account potential future changes in value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's A) Current replacement value. That's what we learned in class.
upvoted 0 times
Carla
3 months ago
I think it's B) Notional value of the derivative, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
3 months ago
I agree, it's definitely A) Current replacement value.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
James
4 months ago
I agree with Stephaine, the current replacement value makes more sense as it reflects the actual risk exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
4 months ago
I believe it's actually the notional value of the derivative that is used to measure credit exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
I think credit exposure for derivatives is measured using the current replacement value.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel