PRMIA 8010 Exam - Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's 8010 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 2

[All 8010 Questions]

Credit exposure for derivatives is measured using

ACurrent replacement value

BNotional value of the derivative

CForward looking exposure profile of the derivative

DStandard normal distribution

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Current replacement values are a very poor measure of the credit exposure from a derivative contract, because the future value of these instruments is unpredictable, ie is stochastic, and the range of values it can take increases the further ahead in the future we look. Therefore it is common for credit exposures for derivatives to be measured using forward looking exposure profiles, which are distributions of the expected value of the derivative at the time horizon for which credit risk is being measured. To be conservative, a high enough quintile of this distribution is taken as the 'loan equivalent value' of the derivative as the exposure. Choice 'c' is the correct answer.

The notional value of derivative contracts generally tends to be quite high and unrelated to their economic value or the counterparty exposure. Therefore notional value is irrelevant.

by Lenna at Jul 06, 2025, 04:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 8010 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Maynard

2 months ago

Forward looking exposure profile is also a key factor!

upvoted 0 times

...

Emeline

2 months ago

I agree, current replacement value makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

2 months ago

It's definitely the current replacement value!

upvoted 0 times

...

Crista

3 months ago

Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds too simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherly

3 months ago

I thought it was just the notional value?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

3 months ago

Standard normal distribution seems off for this question; I don't think it relates directly to credit exposure for derivatives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

3 months ago

I feel like forward-looking exposure profile could be relevant, but I can't recall if it's the primary measure for credit exposure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

4 months ago

I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think notional value was mentioned as a measure, but it might not capture the full risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

4 months ago

I think credit exposure is often measured using the current replacement value, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tish

4 months ago

The current replacement value seems like the most direct way to measure credit exposure. It's the amount the bank would have to pay to replace the contract if the counterparty defaulted. That seems like the key risk factor to focus on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

4 months ago

I'm a little confused on the difference between current replacement value and forward-looking exposure profile. Aren't they both trying to get at the potential future losses? I'll have to review my notes on this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margart

4 months ago

Okay, I remember discussing this in class. The current replacement value is the amount it would cost to replace the derivative contract at the current market rates. That makes sense as the measure of credit exposure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delbert

4 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know credit exposure has to do with the potential future losses, but I'm not sure if that's the same as the current replacement value. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...