Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA Exam 8010 Topic 1 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's 8010 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 1
[All 8010 Questions]

In estimating credit exposure for a line of credit, it is usual to consider:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Volatility clustering leads to levels of current volatility that can be significantly different from long run averages. When volatility is running high, institutions need to shed risk, and when it is running low, they can afford to increase returns by taking on more risk for a given amount of capital. An institution's response to changes in volatility can be either to adjust risk, or capital, or both. Accounting for volatility clustering helps institutions manage their risk and capital and therefore statements I and II are correct.

Regulatory requirements do not require volatility clustering to be taken into account (at least not yet). Therefore statement III is not correct, and neither is IV which is completely unrelated to volatility clustering.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Irving
13 days ago
Wait, did they mention anything about a magic 8-ball in the question? Cause that's the only way I'm picking an answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
15 days ago
Option A is the way to go. It's a standard industry practice. Why reinvent the wheel?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
29 days ago
Option D? Really? Calculating the present value of the entire credit line? That's overkill. This isn't a college finance exam, you know.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
1 days ago
C) only the value of credit exposure currently existing against the credit line as the exposure at default.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
8 days ago
A) a fixed fraction of the line of credit to be the exposure at default even though the currently drawn amount is quite different from such a fraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roosevelt
1 months ago
I'd go with option C. It's the most straightforward and realistic approach. Why overcomplicate things?
upvoted 0 times
Cathern
1 days ago
I think option A could also be a valid approach, considering a fixed fraction of the line of credit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
27 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the simplest way to estimate credit exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jordan
1 months ago
Option B seems a bit too extreme. I don't think we can assume the borrower will always max out the credit line at default. That's a bit of a stretch.
upvoted 0 times
Zona
2 days ago
I think option A makes more sense, considering a fixed fraction of the line of credit as the exposure at default.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
7 days ago
I agree, option B does seem a bit extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carole
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think the answer is D. We should consider the present value of the line of credit at the agreed rate of lending for a more accurate estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C. We should only consider the current value of credit exposure against the credit line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
I think the answer is A, because it makes sense to consider a fixed fraction of the line of credit as the exposure at default.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel