Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA 8010 Exam - Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Posted by Paris on Jun 16, 2022 at 09:44 AM

Which of the following statements is true in respect of a non financial manufacturing firm?

1. Market risk is not relevant to the manufacturing firm as it does not take proprietary positions

2. The firm faces market risks as an externality which it must bear and has no control over

3. Market risks can make a comparative assessment of profitability over time difficult

4. Market risks for a manufacturing firm are not directionally biased and do not increase the overall risk of the firm as they net to zero over a long term time horizon

Suggested Answer: A

A non-financial firm such as a manufacturing company faces market risks similar to those faced by financial firms, except perhaps for not being exposed to risks from the equity markets. Non financial firms commonly face interest rate risks in respect of their debts, commodity price risks in respect of their inputs and products, and foreign currency risks in respect of their overseas operations. It is therefore not correct to say that the manufacturing firm does not face market risk because it does not take proprietary positions. While decisions on positions may not be actively taken, positions in foreign exchange (eg, through overseas debtors owing foreign currency, or liabilities in foreign currencies to overseas suppliers), commodities (through exposure to the need for raw material and inventory of finished goods) and interest rates (through debt financed, whether at fixed or floating rates) exist and create market risk much in the same way as they would for a proprietary position. Therefore statement I is incorrect.

While the firm faces market risks as an externality (as do financial firms for that matter, though often they seek such exposure to profit from their view on which way the externality will express itself), it is incorrect to say that these risks must be borne. They can be measured and hedged. Therefore statement II is incorrect.

The results of a manufacturing firm will include gains and losses arising from exposure to market risk, and will cloud the true profitability of the business. A firm with significant unhedged overseas sales may show vastly different results across time periods due to the FX gains and losses, making comparative assessment of profitability difficult. Therefore statement III is correct.

Market risks for a manufacturing firm may be directionally biased in terms of exposure, ie there may be a consistent 'long' position in a particular commodity that the firm produces, and a consistent 'short' position in the commodities consumed. In the same way, directional biases may exist in FX or interest rate exposures too. Regardless of the bias, the existence of market risk exposures increase the volatility of the income stream and make the firm more risky, even though the long term expected returns from such exposures is zero (ie, returns may be zero but standard deviation is not). Therefore statement IV is not correct as market risks form non financial firms do increase the overall risk of the firm.


Get Premium 8010 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
CH
Cherry 11 months ago
Isn't it weird to say market risk isn't relevant?
JO
Jose 11 months ago
I think statement 2 makes more sense than 1.
TA
Tammi 12 months ago
Wait, how can market risks net to zero? That sounds off.
CA
Carline 12 months ago
Totally agree with statement 3!
SH
Sharika 12 months ago
Market risks definitely affect profitability over time.
CA
Cassi 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we debated the relevance of market risks, and I thought they were always a concern for firms, not just externalities.
DO
Dong 1 year ago
I feel like statement 2 is also true since manufacturing firms are affected by external market conditions, but I can't recall the details.
KR
Kristel 1 year ago
I remember discussing how market risks can impact profitability, but I'm not sure if they really net to zero over time.
MI
Mica 1 year ago
I think statement 3 makes sense because market risks can complicate profitability assessments, especially in volatile markets.
FA
Fausto 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Do I really need to upgrade to the latest Engineer Special right away? That seems like it could introduce more problems than it solves. I think I'd focus on steps like understanding the physical model and VoIP protocol, as well as collecting the service logs. That should give me a solid foundation to start troubleshooting.
CH
Chaya 1 year ago
The FIFO ordering requirement is important. The Azure Service Bus Queue should be able to handle that, but I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel