Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2 Practitioner Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

The project board has asked user and supplier assurance to review all product descriptions relating to the 'updated corporate quality procedures', prior to authorizing the stage plan for stage 3.Is this appropriate as part of the 'directing a project' process, and why?
D) No, because the project board should review new product descriptions before they authorize the stage 3 plan.
A) Yes, because project assurance should assess whether all stakeholders have been identified, if requested by the project board.
B) Yes, because project assurance should review the stage 3 plan for viability, if requested by the project board.
C) No, because the project manager is responsible for writing product descriptions when creating the stage 3 plan.

PRINCE2 Practitioner Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2 Practitioner exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 4
[All PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions]

The project board has asked user and supplier assurance to review all product descriptions relating to the 'updated corporate quality procedures', prior to authorizing the stage plan for stage 3.

Is this appropriate as part of the 'directing a project' process, and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jenelle at Jul 26, 2022, 02:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kenneth
10 months ago
Really? I thought product descriptions were just a formality.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
10 months ago
The project board should definitely review before authorization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
11 months ago
Wait, isn't the project manager supposed to handle that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
11 months ago
Totally agree, they need to ensure viability too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
11 months ago
Yes, assurance is key for stakeholder identification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
I feel like the project board should definitely review the product descriptions before authorizing anything. It seems like a crucial step to ensure everything aligns with their expectations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
11 months ago
I lean towards option B, but I’m a bit confused. Shouldn’t the project manager be the one to assess the viability of the stage plan instead of assurance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
11 months ago
I remember a practice question where the project board had to ensure all stakeholders were considered. Maybe that's why they want assurance to review the descriptions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
11 months ago
I think it's important for project assurance to be involved, but I'm not sure if they should review product descriptions specifically. It feels like something the project manager should handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. Is the "identity class" a different concept from primary and secondary identities? I'll need to double-check my understanding before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The metadata could be stored in the Catalogs directory or the Data directory, so I'm torn between A and B. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
12 months ago
I've got this! The question is asking if the NMS/COM port can be used to configure data on the RTN 380, and the answer is clearly True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
12 months ago
I lean towards B as well, since it seems he wants his team to feel involved, even if he makes the final call.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel