New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRINCE2 Practitioner Exam - Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2 Practitioner exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 3
[All PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions]

Scenario

Additional Information

Product Description

Quality notes from the Daily Log

The Director of Information Technology Division (DIT) has been asked to ensure that any changes to the outsourced staff employment contracts adhere to employment law. The DIT will review future job descriptions of the transferred staff before the final contract is signed with the selected service provider.

The service level agreement between MFH and the selected service provider will specify the type and quality of service required. The selected service provider must follow the industry standards for providing outsourced services.

MFH has a quality management system which contains a document control procedure for all its documentation, however this does not include change management.

All project documents will be subject to a quality review. Nominated products will require a formal approval record signed-off by the quality review chair.

Extract from the draft Quality Management Strategy (may contain errors)

Introduction

1. This document defines the approach to be taken to achieve the required quality levels during the project.

2. The Project Board will have overall responsibility for the Quality Management Strategy.

3. Project Assurance will provide assurance on the implementation of the Quality Management Strategy.

Quality management procedure - Quality standards

4. The selected service provider will operate to industry standards for providing outsourced services.

5. MFH document standards will be used.

Records

6. A Quality Register will be maintained to record the planned quality events and the actual results from the quality activities.

7. Configuration Item Records will be maintained for each product to describe its status, version and variant.

8. Approval records for products that require them will be stored in the quality database.

Roles and responsibilities

9. The DIT will check that the employment contracts for outsourced staff adhere to employment law.

10. Team Managers will provide details of quality checks that have been carried out.

11. Team Managers will ensure that the Quality Register is updated with the names of team members who are involved in the review process.

12. The Senior User will review the Product Descriptions of the products to be produced by the selected service provider to ensure that they can be achieved.

The service level agreement contains a number of technical terms that are missing from its glossary of terms.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jesusita
3 months ago
Not sure if no action (D) is a good idea, that could lead to confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, we need clarity in the terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
4 months ago
Surprised there’s no glossary yet! How did that happen?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
4 months ago
I disagree, raising an issue (B) makes more sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
Seems like option A is the best way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
5 months ago
I recall that no action might be needed if it doesn't impact the project, but missing terms seem significant. I’m leaning towards raising an issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether obtaining agreement from the Director is the right move. I thought we needed to follow a formal process for changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on actions for missing documentation. I feel like raising an issue might be the safest route here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to have a complete glossary in the service level agreement, but I'm not sure if we should just add the terms or raise an issue first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which option is the best fit. I might need to re-read the question a few times and consider the pros and cons of each approach before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the quality management strategy details, it seems like raising an issue (off-specification) would be the appropriate action here to address the missing technical terms in the glossary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by all the details in this question. There's a lot of background information to sift through. I'll need to take some time to really digest everything before I can decide on the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd start by carefully reviewing the scenario and additional information to understand the key requirements and constraints. Then I'd evaluate the options presented and choose the one that best aligns with the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
11 months ago
I think we should also obtain agreement from the Director of Facilities Division to add the technical terms into the glossary within the tolerance period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
11 months ago
No action required? Yeah, right. If I tried that on my driving test, they'd revoke my license. Gotta address those missing terms, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Melita
10 months ago
Absolutely, we can't afford to overlook those missing terms. Let's get it sorted out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
10 months ago
Raise an issue (request for change).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodrigo
11 months ago
I agree with Berry, it's important to ensure all necessary information is included in the glossary for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
11 months ago
I think we should raise an issue (off-specification) because the technical terms are missing from the glossary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
11 months ago
Missing glossary terms? That's like having a car without wheels. Raise that change request before they try to run us over with it!
upvoted 0 times
Jacqueline
10 months ago
Lilli: Missing glossary terms? That's like having a car without wheels. Raise that change request before they try to run us over with it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
10 months ago
C) Raise an issue (request for change).
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
10 months ago
B) Raise an issue (off-specification).
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
11 months ago
A) Obtain agreement from the Director of Facilities Division to add these into the glossary of terms within the remaining +2 days' tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
11 months ago
Definitely need to raise a request for change. Technical terms in the service level agreement should be clearly defined in the glossary. Can't afford any ambiguity there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
11 months ago
The service level agreement should have a complete glossary of terms. Raising an issue (request for change) seems like the appropriate action to ensure clarity and avoid any misunderstandings.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel