Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2 Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner Topic 3 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Practitioner exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 3
[All PRINCE2-Practitioner Questions]

At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage 3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register.

Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Twana at Jul 03, 2024, 04:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bobbye
3 months ago
Ah, the old 'I'm the developer, the reviewer, and the conductor' trick. Gotta love these project shenanigans!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
3 months ago
Aha, the senior supplier reviewing their own work? Someone's trying to pull a fast one on us here.
upvoted 0 times
Elmer
2 months ago
Aha, the senior supplier reviewing their own work? Someone's trying to pull a fast one on us here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
2 months ago
B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
2 months ago
A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vernice
3 months ago
Hold up, a question list? That's like using a magic 8-ball to find errors. Might as well just guess the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
4 months ago
Documenting possible errors in the quality register sounds like a great way to keep track of issues. Efficiency at its finest!
upvoted 0 times
Emerson
2 months ago
Documenting possible errors in the quality register helps ensure nothing gets missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
2 months ago
B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 months ago
Documenting possible errors in the quality register helps ensure nothing is missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
3 months ago
A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
3 months ago
B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
3 months ago
A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
4 months ago
Wait, the consultant is both the developer and the reviewer? Isn't that a conflict of interest or something?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
4 months ago
I'm not sure about option D. Should the senior supplier really be involved in the quality review process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
4 months ago
I agree with Stevie. It's important to keep the quality register updated during quality review activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 months ago
I think option B is correct. Quality reviewers should update the quality register.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
4 months ago
But shouldn't the quality reviewers be the ones updating the quality register?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
4 months ago
I agree with Genevieve, it helps track the progress of quality review activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
4 months ago
I think it's important to document possible errors in the quality register.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel