Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2 Practitioner Exam - Topic 3 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2 Practitioner exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 3
[All PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions]

At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage 3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register.

Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Twana at Jul 03, 2024, 04:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gaynell
5 months ago
Good catch on those errors, better to document them early!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
5 months ago
Wait, why is the consultant both a supplier and a reviewer? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
5 months ago
Totally agree, the quality register needs to be updated by the reviewers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
6 months ago
I disagree, the errors should go on a question list, not the quality register.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
6 months ago
Sounds like a solid approach to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
6 months ago
I vaguely remember that possible errors should be documented, but I thought it was more about a question list rather than the quality register. So, maybe option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
6 months ago
I feel like we had a similar question about roles in quality reviews, and I thought the senior supplier shouldn't be a reviewer. Maybe option D is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
6 months ago
I think option B makes sense because quality reviewers are supposed to document findings, but I can't recall if the consultant's role changes that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
7 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of updating the quality register during our practice sessions, but I'm not sure if it applies to the consultant in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
7 months ago
Interesting scenario. I'm a bit unsure about whether documenting possible errors in the quality register is the right move. I'll need to review the information and think through the implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
7 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I think the key here is to consider whether the consultant's actions align with the expected quality review process. I'll need to analyze the choices carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
7 months ago
Okay, let me see here. The consultant found 15 possible errors and documented them in the quality register. I'm not sure if that's the right approach, but I'll have to weigh the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the details and think about the appropriate quality review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. The error message suggests a database connection problem, so I'll focus on the security group and port configuration options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
12 months ago
Ah, the old 'I'm the developer, the reviewer, and the conductor' trick. Gotta love these project shenanigans!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
12 months ago
Aha, the senior supplier reviewing their own work? Someone's trying to pull a fast one on us here.
upvoted 0 times
Elmer
10 months ago
Aha, the senior supplier reviewing their own work? Someone's trying to pull a fast one on us here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
10 months ago
B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
10 months ago
A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vernice
12 months ago
Hold up, a question list? That's like using a magic 8-ball to find errors. Might as well just guess the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
12 months ago
Documenting possible errors in the quality register sounds like a great way to keep track of issues. Efficiency at its finest!
upvoted 0 times
Emerson
10 months ago
Documenting possible errors in the quality register helps ensure nothing gets missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
10 months ago
B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
11 months ago
Documenting possible errors in the quality register helps ensure nothing is missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
11 months ago
A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
11 months ago
B) Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
11 months ago
A) Yes, because each team manager should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
12 months ago
Wait, the consultant is both the developer and the reviewer? Isn't that a conflict of interest or something?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 year ago
I'm not sure about option D. Should the senior supplier really be involved in the quality review process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
1 year ago
I agree with Stevie. It's important to keep the quality register updated during quality review activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 year ago
I think option B is correct. Quality reviewers should update the quality register.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 year ago
But shouldn't the quality reviewers be the ones updating the quality register?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
1 year ago
I agree with Genevieve, it helps track the progress of quality review activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
1 year ago
I think it's important to document possible errors in the quality register.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel