At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage 3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register.
Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?
Bobbye
21 days agoRachael
22 days agoVernice
26 days agoAhmed
1 months agoOlen
1 days agoReyes
3 days agoEdward
7 days agoWillard
1 months agoYolande
1 months agoViva
2 months agoStevie
2 months agoWynell
2 months agoMaurine
2 months agoGenevieve
2 months ago