Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2 Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner Topic 2 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Practitioner exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 2
[All PRINCE2-Practitioner Questions]

ABC has experience of delivering training projects that respond to new legislation. Previous projects have had to change the acceptance criteria, due to further updates being made to legislation during the project.

What action should be taken to address this, and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Fairy at Apr 24, 2024, 08:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Iluminada
3 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Changing the acceptance criteria is a given, so we might as well plan for it from the start.
upvoted 0 times
Ricarda
2 months ago
Definitely, quality tolerances define what is acceptable and give us room for adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
2 months ago
Agree, setting quality tolerances in product descriptions allows for flexibility with changes in legislation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
2 months ago
Yes, that way we can easily make amendments through change control if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
2 months ago
I agree, it's important to prioritize acceptance criteria from the beginning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
3 months ago
Ha! Imagine if they'd gone with option C. Setting 'quality tolerances' for legislation? That's a new one! I'll stick with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
3 months ago
Hmm, option D seems the most logical. Quality tolerances will let us account for any legislative changes, so the project can still be closed successfully.
upvoted 0 times
Rodolfo
2 months ago
User 3: That makes sense, it's important to have flexibility in the acceptance criteria for training projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
3 months ago
User 2: Yes, setting quality tolerances in the product descriptions will help us adapt to any updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, option D seems like the best choice to handle changes in legislation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Burma
4 months ago
I'll go with option B. Agreed acceptance criteria can always be updated through change control, so it's the most flexible choice.
upvoted 0 times
Ramonita
3 months ago
User 3: Yes, it's important to prioritize flexibility in case of changes to legislation during the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
3 months ago
User 2: I agree, having the ability to amend the acceptance criteria if needed is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
3 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice. It allows for flexibility through change control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
4 months ago
But what if there are further updates to legislation? Shouldn't we set quality tolerances in the product descriptions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
4 months ago
I agree with Mindy. It will help us determine if the project can be closed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
4 months ago
I think we should prioritize the acceptance criteria during the initiation stage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel