Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2 Practitioner Exam - Topic 2 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2 Practitioner exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 2
[All PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions]

ABC has experience of delivering training projects that respond to new legislation. Previous projects have had to change the acceptance criteria, due to further updates being made to legislation during the project.

What action should be taken to address this, and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Fairy at Apr 24, 2024, 08:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alesia
5 months ago
I agree with A, prioritizing upfront is crucial for project closure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
5 months ago
D is a good point, but how do we define those tolerances effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
5 months ago
C sounds interesting, but can we really keep up with constant legislation changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
6 months ago
Not sure about that, I prefer A. Acceptance criteria should be solid from the start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
6 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Change control is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
6 months ago
I feel like we covered something similar where we had to adapt to new regulations mid-project. I wonder if option A or B would be better for that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether setting quality tolerances really helps with acceptance criteria. I thought those were more about the product's performance rather than legislative changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
6 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar from our practice questions. It makes sense to have a change control process in place for amendments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
7 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is to establish acceptance criteria early on, but I'm not sure if prioritizing them during initiation is enough if legislation keeps changing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to set quality tolerances for the acceptance criteria in the product descriptions, as per option D. That way, you can accommodate changes in legislation without having to constantly update the criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about addressing changes to legislation during the project, so I'm not sure if option A is the best choice. I might need to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about managing acceptance criteria. I think I'll go with option B - prioritizing the criteria during initiation and then using change control to amend them if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
7 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The best approach is to agree and prioritize the acceptance criteria during the initiation stage, as in option A. That way, you have a clear baseline to work from, and you can use change control to manage any updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
7 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward accounting question. I'm confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
7 months ago
I think the key here is understanding who has the ultimate authority and responsibility for risk management in an organization. Based on that, I believe the board of directors is the correct answer, so I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
7 months ago
I think the Least bandwidth option would be the best choice here. It should distribute the load more evenly by sending new connections to the server with the least network utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
11 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Changing the acceptance criteria is a given, so we might as well plan for it from the start.
upvoted 0 times
Ricarda
10 months ago
Definitely, quality tolerances define what is acceptable and give us room for adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
11 months ago
Agree, setting quality tolerances in product descriptions allows for flexibility with changes in legislation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
11 months ago
Yes, that way we can easily make amendments through change control if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
11 months ago
I agree, it's important to prioritize acceptance criteria from the beginning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
11 months ago
Ha! Imagine if they'd gone with option C. Setting 'quality tolerances' for legislation? That's a new one! I'll stick with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
12 months ago
Hmm, option D seems the most logical. Quality tolerances will let us account for any legislative changes, so the project can still be closed successfully.
upvoted 0 times
Rodolfo
11 months ago
User 3: That makes sense, it's important to have flexibility in the acceptance criteria for training projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
11 months ago
User 2: Yes, setting quality tolerances in the product descriptions will help us adapt to any updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
11 months ago
User 1: I agree, option D seems like the best choice to handle changes in legislation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Burma
1 year ago
I'll go with option B. Agreed acceptance criteria can always be updated through change control, so it's the most flexible choice.
upvoted 0 times
Ramonita
11 months ago
User 3: Yes, it's important to prioritize flexibility in case of changes to legislation during the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
12 months ago
User 2: I agree, having the ability to amend the acceptance criteria if needed is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
12 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice. It allows for flexibility through change control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
1 year ago
But what if there are further updates to legislation? Shouldn't we set quality tolerances in the product descriptions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
1 year ago
I agree with Mindy. It will help us determine if the project can be closed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
1 year ago
I think we should prioritize the acceptance criteria during the initiation stage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel