Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2 Practitioner Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

The project is now in stage 2. The 'training venue specifications' will not be delivered to schedule and the stage is forecast to exceed its time tolerance. As a result, the project manager has agreed with the team manager that the 'training venue specifications' will be delivered in stage 3 instead of stage 2.Is this an appropriate action, and why?
D) No, because the stage deviation should be referred to the project board for a decision.
A) Yes, because the project manager should recommend corrective actions required.
B) Yes, because moving the work enables stage 2 to be delivered within tolerance.
C) No, because the team manager should inform the project manager by raising an issue.

PRINCE2 Practitioner Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2 Practitioner exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 2
[All PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions]

The project is now in stage 2. The 'training venue specifications' will not be delivered to schedule and the stage is forecast to exceed its time tolerance. As a result, the project manager has agreed with the team manager that the 'training venue specifications' will be delivered in stage 3 instead of stage 2.

Is this an appropriate action, and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Reference https://www.prince2primer.com/project-board-and-project-manager-prince2-controls/


by Jennie at Mar 20, 2023, 10:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2 Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Emmett
10 months ago
Totally with you, moving it makes sense for the project's flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
10 months ago
Just a reminder, stage 2 is already exceeding its time tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
11 months ago
Wait, is it really okay to push it to stage 3?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
11 months ago
I agree, better to deliver on time than rush it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
11 months ago
Sounds like a smart move to keep stage 2 on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
11 months ago
I think the project board should be involved in decisions like this, so option D might be the best answer, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
11 months ago
I feel like the team manager should definitely raise an issue if there's a delay, but I'm not clear if that means the project manager can't make adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
11 months ago
I remember a similar question where the focus was on keeping the project within tolerance, so option B seems like the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think moving the specifications to stage 3 might be okay if it keeps stage 2 on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it asking about the criteria for the requirements themselves, or the criteria for the contract? I want to make sure I understand the question properly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
11 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. I think the key features are that there's a predefined list of values, but you can also enter your own. So I'll go with A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and it definitely emphasized needing the right context for the CLI commands. "config t" seems off for switching VDCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
12 months ago
I think requiring auditors to read audit journals and references is a good way to establish consistency. That would help align them on best practices and industry standards. But I'm curious to hear what the other options might be.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel