Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 3 Question 106 Discussion

A contract has fust been awarded for an automation project that was supported by the local community. The project manager was warned by the elected officials that the project cannot proceed.Why did this action occur?
D) Lack of a proper legal framework in place
A) Inadequate funds for the automation project
B) Inadequate engagement of the political stakeholders
C) Lack of competence to manage the automation project

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 3 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMP exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 3
[All PMP Questions]

A contract has fust been awarded for an automation project that was supported by the local community. The project manager was warned by the elected officials that the project cannot proceed.

Why did this action occur?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the AI & SOCIETY article1, legal structures may form barriers to, or enablers of, adoption of precision agriculture management with small autonomous agricultural robots. The article develops a conceptual regulatory framework for small autonomous agricultural robots, from a practical, self-contained engineering guide perspective, sufficient to get working research and commercial agricultural roboticists quickly and easily up and running within the law. The article examines the liability framework, or rather lack of it, for agricultural robotics in EU, and their transpositions to UK law, as a case study illustrating general international legal concepts and issues. It examines how the law may provide mitigating effects on the liability regime, and how contracts can be developed between agents within it to enable smooth operation. It covers other legal aspects of operation such as the use of shared communications resources and privacy in the reuse of robot-collected data. Where there are some grey areas in current law, it argues that new proposals could be developed to reform these to promote further innovation and investment in agricultural robots.Therefore, the lack of a proper legal framework in place for the automation project may be the reason why the elected officials warned the project manager that the project cannot proceed, as they may face legal uncertainties, risks, or challenges that could affect the project's feasibility, legitimacy, or acceptability.Reference: AI & SOCIETY article1


by Michell at Aug 16, 2025, 08:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Luis
9 months ago
Lack of legal framework could definitely be a dealbreaker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
9 months ago
Wait, how can they award a contract if officials said no?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
9 months ago
Sounds like they didn't involve the right people early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
9 months ago
Totally agree, political buy-in is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
I heard funding was tight, but not sure if that's the whole story.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
10 months ago
I wonder if the lack of a legal framework could be an issue too. Option D seems relevant, but I don't remember us focusing on that aspect much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
10 months ago
I feel like we went over a similar question about project management and political support. I think option B makes the most sense here, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
10 months ago
I think it might be related to funding issues, but I can't recall if that was a common reason we studied. Option A sounds plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
10 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder engagement in class. It seems like option B could be the right answer, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The details suggest an issue with political engagement, so I'm leaning towards option B as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
11 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of stakeholder management. I'll focus on analyzing the relationship between the project manager and the elected officials to determine the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the main issue that led to the project being halted, even though it had community support. I'll weigh the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the situation before choosing an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the details provided and think through the possible reasons why the project was stopped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
1 year ago
I think the action occurred because of inadequate engagement of the political stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
1 year ago
The lack of political engagement is clearly the issue here. The officials should have been involved from the start. How do you expect to get anything done without those in power on your side? B is the obvious choice.
upvoted 0 times
Dong
12 months ago
I agree, their support is crucial for the success of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
12 months ago
We should have involved the officials from the beginning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel