New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMP exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 2
[All PMP Questions]

During the release of an important product, a vice president for a different product line brought a valid concern to the project team, which had to be completed before the release. The vice president has not participated in other product discussions until now. This additional work resulted in a delay of the product release.

How should the project manager have handled this situation earlier in the project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When faced with a situation where a vice president from a different product line brings a valid concern during the release of an important product, the project manager should have proactively identified the vice president as a stakeholder. Here's why:

1. Stakeholder Identification:

o Identifying stakeholders is a critical step in project management.

o Stakeholders include anyone who has an interest in or can be affected by the project.

o The vice president's involvement in the project, even if not previously engaged, makes them a relevant stakeholder.

2. Benefits of Identifying Stakeholders:

o Recognizing the vice president as a stakeholder allows the project manager to consider their concerns and priorities.

o It facilitates effective communication and collaboration throughout the project lifecycle.

o Stakeholder engagement ensures that all relevant perspectives are considered.

3. Risk Mitigation:

o By identifying the vice president as a stakeholder early on, the project manager could have addressed their concerns proactively.

o Recording the concerns in the risk register (Option B) is also valuable, but stakeholder identification comes first.

4. Project Boundaries and Scope:

o Sharing project boundaries and scope (Option D) is essential, but it doesn't directly address the vice president's concerns.

o Escalating dissent to top management (Option C) should be a last resort after attempting to resolve issues at lower levels.

In summary, identifying the vice president as a stakeholder would have allowed the project manager to engage them effectively, address their concerns, and prevent delays in the product release.


* [Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Aretha
3 months ago
Sharing project boundaries is crucial, but it’s too late now!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
3 months ago
Recording concerns in the risk register is key for tracking issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
3 months ago
Wait, how did the VP just show up now? Seems fishy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
4 months ago
I agree, better communication could've avoided the delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
4 months ago
Should've definitely identified the VP as a stakeholder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
4 months ago
Sharing project boundaries sounds like a solid approach to keep everyone aligned. I feel like that could have helped avoid this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
4 months ago
Escalating dissent to top management feels a bit extreme for this situation. I wonder if it would have just created more tension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where recording concerns in the risk register was emphasized. It seems like a good way to track issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
5 months ago
I think identifying the vice president as a stakeholder makes sense, but I'm not sure if that alone would have prevented the delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'd say the project manager should have escalated the VP's concerns to top management right away, rather than waiting until the last minute. That could have helped resolve the issue sooner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is communication. The project manager should have made sure everyone, including this VP, was aware of the project scope and boundaries from the start. That could have prevented this last-minute issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different options, and I'm not sure which one is the best approach. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward project management question. I'd focus on identifying the key stakeholders early on and making sure their concerns are addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
11 months ago
Haha, the project manager should have bribed the vice president with a lifetime supply of donuts. Then maybe they would have stayed out of it!
upvoted 0 times
Belen
11 months ago
D) Shared project boundaries so that everyone was aware of the scope
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
11 months ago
B) Recorded the vice president's concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
11 months ago
A) Identified the vice president as a stakeholder
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
12 months ago
D seems like the way to go. Clearly defining the project boundaries and scope would have set the right expectations and avoided this last-minute change.
upvoted 0 times
Mitzie
11 months ago
D) Shared project boundaries so that everyone was aware of the scope
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
11 months ago
B) Recorded the vice president's concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
11 months ago
A) Identified the vice president as a stakeholder
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaiah
12 months ago
I think B is the right answer. Recording the vice president's concerns in the risk register would have helped the team anticipate and plan for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Salena
11 months ago
B) Recorded the vice president's concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
11 months ago
A) Identified the vice president as a stakeholder
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
1 year ago
I think recording the vice president's concerns in the risk register would have also been helpful to track potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
I agree with Basilia, it's important to involve all stakeholders from the beginning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
1 year ago
The correct answer is A. The project manager should have identified the vice president as a stakeholder early on. Without involving all key stakeholders, the project is doomed to face such challenges.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
11 months ago
D) Shared project boundaries so that everyone was aware of the scope
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
C) Escalated any dissent to top management right away
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
11 months ago
B) Recorded the vice president's concerns in the risk register
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
11 months ago
A) Identified the vice president as a stakeholder
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Basilia
1 year ago
The project manager should have identified the vice president as a stakeholder.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel