PMI PMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMP exam

Question #: 92
Topic #: 2

A project is halfway through its execution phase. The quality specifications for the project deliverables are formally accepted. However, a key stakeholder is dissatisfied, stating that the deliverables do not meet the quality specifications.

What should the project manager do in this situation?

ANotify the stakeholder that arbitration procedures will be followed.

BInform the project sponsor of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.

CDocument the issue in the issue log and send a report to management.

DReview the requirements traceability matrix and conduct inspections.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Hildegarde at Oct 19, 2024, 03:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Huey

5 months ago

Not sure if arbitration is the right move just yet...

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

5 months ago

I think documenting the issue is a must, but inspections too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

5 months ago

Wait, how can they be dissatisfied if specs were accepted?

upvoted 0 times

...

Torie

5 months ago

Totally agree, they should check the requirements first!

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

6 months ago

Sounds like a classic case of miscommunication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

6 months ago

I feel like conducting inspections could help clarify the quality issues, but I wonder if that’s too late in the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzi

6 months ago

I'm a bit confused about whether to focus on the issue log or the requirements traceability matrix. Both seem important in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

6 months ago

I remember a similar question where we had to consider stakeholder communication. Maybe informing the project sponsor is the right move here?

upvoted 0 times

...

Miesha

6 months ago

I think the project manager should definitely document the issue, but I'm not sure if just sending a report is enough.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lera

6 months ago

Ah, this is a classic project management challenge. I'd go with reviewing the requirements traceability matrix and conducting inspections. That should help identify any gaps or misalignments with the quality specs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

6 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'd document the issue thoroughly in the log, and then send a detailed report to management. That way, there's a clear paper trail and they can help resolve the situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawana

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. I think I'd want to start by informing the project sponsor, since they need to be aware of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction. That seems like the safest first step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nydia

7 months ago

This seems like a tricky situation. I'd want to carefully review the quality specifications and requirements to understand where the disconnect is with the stakeholder.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mertie

11 months ago

This is why you always get the stakeholders to sign off on the quality specs upfront. Now the project manager has to deal with this diva of a stakeholder.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. Notifying the sponsor might be a good idea to get some backup on this issue.

upvoted 0 times

Thad

10 months ago

C: Review the requirements traceability matrix and conduct inspections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. Notifying the sponsor might be a good idea to get some backup on this issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

10 months ago

C) Document the issue in the issue log and send a report to management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

10 months ago

B: Document the issue in the issue log and send a report to management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

10 months ago

B) Inform the project sponsor of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ngoc

10 months ago

A) Notify the stakeholder that arbitration procedures will be followed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irene

10 months ago

A: Notify the project sponsor of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

12 months ago

Hold up, what if the stakeholder is just being picky? Maybe they need to chill out and trust the project manager's expertise.

upvoted 0 times

Leonor

11 months ago

D) Review the requirements traceability matrix and conduct inspections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alita

11 months ago

C) Document the issue in the issue log and send a report to management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

11 months ago

B) Inform the project sponsor of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherri

12 months ago

A) Notify the stakeholder that arbitration procedures will be followed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

1 year ago

I agree, option D is the best choice here. The project manager needs to ensure the deliverables meet the established quality specifications.

upvoted 0 times

Felton

12 months ago

I think conducting inspections will help identify any discrepancies and address the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

12 months ago

Yes, reviewing the requirements traceability matrix is crucial to ensure the deliverables meet the quality specifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

1 year ago

This question seems straightforward. The project manager should review the requirements traceability matrix and conduct inspections to validate the deliverables and address the stakeholder's concerns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erasmo

1 year ago

Documenting the issue and sending a report to management seems like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

1 year ago

I think we should review the requirements traceability matrix.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raymon

1 year ago

We need to address the stakeholder's concerns.

upvoted 0 times

...