New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMP exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 2
[All PMP Questions]

A project is halfway through its execution phase. The quality specifications for the project deliverables are formally accepted. However, a key stakeholder is dissatisfied, stating that the deliverables do not meet the quality specifications.

What should the project manager do in this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Huey
3 months ago
Not sure if arbitration is the right move just yet...
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
3 months ago
I think documenting the issue is a must, but inspections too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
3 months ago
Wait, how can they be dissatisfied if specs were accepted?
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
4 months ago
Totally agree, they should check the requirements first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of miscommunication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
4 months ago
I feel like conducting inspections could help clarify the quality issues, but I wonder if that’s too late in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether to focus on the issue log or the requirements traceability matrix. Both seem important in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to consider stakeholder communication. Maybe informing the project sponsor is the right move here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
5 months ago
I think the project manager should definitely document the issue, but I'm not sure if just sending a report is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
5 months ago
Ah, this is a classic project management challenge. I'd go with reviewing the requirements traceability matrix and conducting inspections. That should help identify any gaps or misalignments with the quality specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'd document the issue thoroughly in the log, and then send a detailed report to management. That way, there's a clear paper trail and they can help resolve the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. I think I'd want to start by informing the project sponsor, since they need to be aware of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction. That seems like the safest first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky situation. I'd want to carefully review the quality specifications and requirements to understand where the disconnect is with the stakeholder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
9 months ago
This is why you always get the stakeholders to sign off on the quality specs upfront. Now the project manager has to deal with this diva of a stakeholder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Notifying the sponsor might be a good idea to get some backup on this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Thad
8 months ago
C: Review the requirements traceability matrix and conduct inspections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Notifying the sponsor might be a good idea to get some backup on this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
8 months ago
C) Document the issue in the issue log and send a report to management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
8 months ago
B: Document the issue in the issue log and send a report to management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
8 months ago
B) Inform the project sponsor of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
9 months ago
A) Notify the stakeholder that arbitration procedures will be followed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
9 months ago
A: Notify the project sponsor of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diane
10 months ago
Hold up, what if the stakeholder is just being picky? Maybe they need to chill out and trust the project manager's expertise.
upvoted 0 times
Leonor
9 months ago
D) Review the requirements traceability matrix and conduct inspections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
9 months ago
C) Document the issue in the issue log and send a report to management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
9 months ago
B) Inform the project sponsor of the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
10 months ago
A) Notify the stakeholder that arbitration procedures will be followed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lettie
10 months ago
I agree, option D is the best choice here. The project manager needs to ensure the deliverables meet the established quality specifications.
upvoted 0 times
Felton
10 months ago
I think conducting inspections will help identify any discrepancies and address the stakeholder's dissatisfaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
10 months ago
Yes, reviewing the requirements traceability matrix is crucial to ensure the deliverables meet the quality specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anglea
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward. The project manager should review the requirements traceability matrix and conduct inspections to validate the deliverables and address the stakeholder's concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
Documenting the issue and sending a report to management seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
I think we should review the requirements traceability matrix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
11 months ago
We need to address the stakeholder's concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel