New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMP exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 2
[All PMP Questions]

A product owner has provided the team with a prioritized backlog for the initial

launch of a new product. After analysis, the team concludes that some work is missing to

support the initial launch and provides this information to the product owner. The product

owner acknowledges the missing work and adds it to the bottom of the backlog. The team is

not happy with the prioritization that the missing work received.

What should the project manager do in this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hoa
4 months ago
Analyzing and reprioritizing sounds like the best move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
4 months ago
I think empowering the product owner is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
4 months ago
Wait, why would the product owner ignore the team's input?
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
4 months ago
Totally agree, missing work needs higher priority!
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
4 months ago
The backlog should reflect the most critical tasks for MVP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
5 months ago
I think empowering the product owner is important, but I’m not sure if just going along with their decision is the best approach. Maybe we should push for a discussion?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
5 months ago
I feel like option C makes sense since the missing work is crucial for the MVP, but I wonder if it might upset the product owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
5 months ago
This situation reminds me of a practice question where we had to decide whether to challenge the product owner's prioritization. I think B could be a good choice, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is for the project manager to advocate for the team’s concerns, but I'm not sure which option best reflects that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question and options a few times to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Can the marketing team really just choose any strategy they want, or are there best practices or regulations they need to consider? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
5 months ago
I think this question is asking us to consider the pros and cons of transitioning from component teams to feature teams. I'll need to weigh the potential benefits like reduced communication complexity against the possible initial drop in productivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think I'll go with option A, as inspecting legal documents seems like a key procedure for an auditor to perform when dealing with litigation and claims.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel