New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMP exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 1
[All PMP Questions]

A customer initiated a minor scope change and expects this to be completed without delays or additional costs. The project manager believes that they have adequate

authorization to make the decision themselves but is not quite sure.

What should the project manager do next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Daren
4 months ago
Minor scope changes usually require formal approval, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
4 months ago
Totally agree with C! Gotta follow the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
4 months ago
Really? Can they just decide on their own without consulting anyone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
4 months ago
No way should they just use the contingency fund! That's risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
4 months ago
I think option C is the best way to go. Change control is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
5 months ago
I recall that keeping changes pending until the end could create problems, so I don't think option D is a good idea. I lean towards option B, but I’m not sure if that’s the best approach either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether the project manager has enough authority to make the change without approval. I think option C makes sense, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
5 months ago
I feel like we had a similar practice question where the project manager had to balance customer satisfaction with proper procedures. I think option A could lead to issues later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of following the change control process in class, so I think option C might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
I'm a little confused here. Is Pareto analysis also a valid technique for this type of cost-benefit analysis? I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the differences between these techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since the question specifies "single-fiber" bidirectional WDM, the signals in each direction need to be at different wavelengths to avoid interference. So the answer must be A, True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Option A, discussing risks with the audit client, seems like the least likely to help ensure risk is considered. The other options seem more directly focused on risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, though. I feel like I've seen similar questions where the answer was "False" because of specific vendor restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel