Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-SP Exam - Topic 6 Question 3 Discussion

Mark is the project manager of the GHQ Project. He is happily reporting that his project has a schedule performance index of 2.12. Management, however, does not think this is good news. What is the most likely reason why management does not like an SPI of 2.12?
A) It is not good news because a larger number means the schedule duration estimates were likely to be wrong to begin with.
B) They likely do not understand the SPI formula.
C) It is not good news, as the number should be closer to 100 than 0.
D) It is good news, but Mark may have large cost variances to achieve this value.

PMI-SP Exam - Topic 6 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-SP exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 6
[All PMI-SP Questions]

Mark is the project manager of the GHQ Project. He is happily reporting that his project has a schedule performance index of 2.12. Management, however, does not think this is good news. What is the most likely reason why management does not like an SPI of 2.12?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Cost and schedule performance indexes should be as close to 1 as possible. A larger value, such as 2.12, means that the schedule duration estimates were likely bloated or incorrect to begin with. Answer option B is incorrect. This is not the best choice for this question. Answer option C is incorrect. The number should not be close to 100; it should be close to 1. Answer option D is incorrect. While Mark may have crashed the schedule and driven up costs to achieve the SPI value, a more likely reason is that the time estimates were bloated.


by Junita at May 06, 2022, 08:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-SP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brittni
10 months ago
I thought SPI was good news, this is surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
11 months ago
Management probably thinks the estimates were unrealistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
11 months ago
Wait, is it really bad? I thought higher was better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
11 months ago
Totally agree, that number is way too high!
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
11 months ago
A SPI of 2.12 usually means something's off with the estimates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
11 months ago
I thought SPI should be close to 1 for good performance, so C seems like it could be relevant too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where a high SPI was a red flag for cost overruns, which makes me lean towards D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think management might just not get how SPI works, so B could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
11 months ago
I remember reading that a high SPI can indicate issues with initial estimates, so A might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Using VPC Service Controls to mark the load balancer as a restricted service feels like it would provide a good level of control and security. Plus, I'm more comfortable with VPC Service Controls than Access Context Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
12 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. I need to merge the EMPLOYEES and DONATIONS data sets, then filter for employees who have no donations. I think option C might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel