MENU
During the weekly project meeting a risk manager identified new risks in the last sprint, which might impact the project cost by implementing mitigation plans. The sponsor and some project team members do not agree that those risks can impact the project cost.
What should the risk manager do to resolve the sponsor and project team members' concerns about risk identification?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium PMI-RMP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
BE
Beatriz
11 months ago
Risk identification was done in the last sprint, right?
HO
Holley
11 months ago
D is a good call. Getting experts involved could help.
QU
Queenie
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure those risks are legit? Sounds fishy.
KE
Keshia
12 months ago
Totally agree with B! We need to avoid delays.
DA
Daniela
1 year ago
I think option C makes the most sense. A separate meeting could clarify things.
AN
Angella
1 year ago
Highlighting the importance of agreeing on risk identification sounds familiar; I think we practiced a similar scenario in our group discussions.
CA
Casie
1 year ago
I feel like reinforcing that the risk identification was done properly might not change their minds, especially if they don't see the potential impact.
GI
Gilberto
1 year ago
I think conducting a separate meeting to go over the risk analysis could be effective, but I wonder if it might take too much time.
MA
Maryrose
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder buy-in during our study sessions, but I'm not sure which option best addresses their concerns.
RI
Rima
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. The sponsor and team members don't agree with the risk identification, so the risk manager will need to be diplomatic but firm in addressing their concerns. I think conducting a separate meeting to walk through the analysis could be a good approach.
SH
Sharika
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'd focus on building consensus and buy-in from the stakeholders. Reinforcing the risk identification process is important, but getting everyone on the same page is key to resolving the concerns.
TA
Tawanna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking what the risk manager should do, but it's not clear if there's a single "best" approach. I may need to think through the pros and cons of each option before deciding.
CE
Celeste
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about resolving stakeholder concerns over risk identification. I think I'd start by reviewing the risk analysis process to make sure it was thorough and well-documented.
OD
Odelia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between information sharing and information hiding. I'll need to think that through carefully before answering.
MY
My
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I've got a good handle on the Function Analysis Systems Technique, so I'll just read through the options carefully and select the one that seems most accurate.
CA
Carma
1 year ago
I think I practiced a question like this before; it mentioned that disconnecting helps prevent short circuits—maybe it's option C or D?
GE
German
1 year ago
Ah, the classic 'I don't see it, so it doesn't exist' approach. The risk manager needs to bring in the big guns (the experts) to show the stakeholders what's really going on. Option D is the way to go, no doubt.
SU
Sue
1 year ago
The most knowledgeable members of the team should validate the risk identification processes. That way, the sponsor and team members can't argue with the findings. Option D is the winner here.
LU
Lucia
1 year ago
Haha, looks like the sponsor and team members are playing a game of 'Not My Problem.' The risk manager needs to highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays. Option B is the way to go.
AI
Aileen
1 year ago
Ensure that the most knowledgeable members of the team validate risk identification processes.
AN
Angella
1 year ago
Highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
LI
Lisandra
2 years ago
Wow, the sponsor and project team members are really not on the same page here. The risk manager needs to reinforce that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint. Option A is the best choice to resolve this issue.
JA
Janet
1 year ago
D) Ensure that the most knowledgeable members of the team validate risk identification processes.
LE
Lennie
1 year ago
B) Highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays.
BA
Barrett
1 year ago
A) Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
ED
Edna
2 years ago
I think the risk manager should conduct a separate meeting to show the risk identification analysis to the stakeholders. That way they can see the data and understand the potential impact on the project cost. Option C is the way to go.
FL
Florinda
1 year ago
C) Conduct a separate meeting to show the risk identification analysis to the stakeholders.
AR
Ardella
1 year ago
A) Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
CU
Curtis
2 years ago
Maybe conducting a separate meeting to discuss the analysis could help address concerns.
KR
Kris
2 years ago
I agree with Mitsue. It's important to show that the process was followed correctly.
MI
Mitsue
2 years ago
I think the risk manager should reinforce that the risk identification was done properly.
PE
Pedro
2 years ago
I believe conducting a separate meeting to discuss the risk identification analysis could also help address concerns.
JA
Javier
2 years ago
I agree with Maurine. It's important to show that the process was thorough.
MA
Maurine
2 years ago
I think the risk manager should reinforce that the risk identification was done properly.