Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 8 Question 76 Discussion

During the weekly project meeting a risk manager identified new risks in the last sprint, which might impact the project cost by implementing mitigation plans. The sponsor and some project team members do not agree that those risks can impact the project cost.What should the risk manager do to resolve the sponsor and project team members' concerns about risk identification?
C) Conduct a separate meeting to show the risk identification analysis to the stakeholders.
A) Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
B) Highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays.
D) Ensure that the most knowledgeable members of the team validate risk identification processes.

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 8 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 8
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

During the weekly project meeting a risk manager identified new risks in the last sprint, which might impact the project cost by implementing mitigation plans. The sponsor and some project team members do not agree that those risks can impact the project cost.

What should the risk manager do to resolve the sponsor and project team members' concerns about risk identification?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sheridan at Apr 26, 2024, 06:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-RMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Beatriz
6 months ago
Risk identification was done in the last sprint, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
6 months ago
D is a good call. Getting experts involved could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure those risks are legit? Sounds fishy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
7 months ago
Totally agree with B! We need to avoid delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
7 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. A separate meeting could clarify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
7 months ago
Highlighting the importance of agreeing on risk identification sounds familiar; I think we practiced a similar scenario in our group discussions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
8 months ago
I feel like reinforcing that the risk identification was done properly might not change their minds, especially if they don't see the potential impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
8 months ago
I think conducting a separate meeting to go over the risk analysis could be effective, but I wonder if it might take too much time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
8 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder buy-in during our study sessions, but I'm not sure which option best addresses their concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. The sponsor and team members don't agree with the risk identification, so the risk manager will need to be diplomatic but firm in addressing their concerns. I think conducting a separate meeting to walk through the analysis could be a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
8 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'd focus on building consensus and buy-in from the stakeholders. Reinforcing the risk identification process is important, but getting everyone on the same page is key to resolving the concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking what the risk manager should do, but it's not clear if there's a single "best" approach. I may need to think through the pros and cons of each option before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about resolving stakeholder concerns over risk identification. I think I'd start by reviewing the risk analysis process to make sure it was thorough and well-documented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between information sharing and information hiding. I'll need to think that through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
8 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I've got a good handle on the Function Analysis Systems Technique, so I'll just read through the options carefully and select the one that seems most accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
8 months ago
I think I practiced a question like this before; it mentioned that disconnecting helps prevent short circuits—maybe it's option C or D?
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
Ah, the classic 'I don't see it, so it doesn't exist' approach. The risk manager needs to bring in the big guns (the experts) to show the stakeholders what's really going on. Option D is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 year ago
The most knowledgeable members of the team should validate the risk identification processes. That way, the sponsor and team members can't argue with the findings. Option D is the winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
1 year ago
Haha, looks like the sponsor and team members are playing a game of 'Not My Problem.' The risk manager needs to highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Aileen
12 months ago
Ensure that the most knowledgeable members of the team validate risk identification processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
12 months ago
Highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
12 months ago
Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisandra
1 year ago
Wow, the sponsor and project team members are really not on the same page here. The risk manager needs to reinforce that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint. Option A is the best choice to resolve this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Janet
1 year ago
D) Ensure that the most knowledgeable members of the team validate risk identification processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
1 year ago
B) Highlight the importance of agreeing on the risk identification to avoid further delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 year ago
A) Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edna
1 year ago
I think the risk manager should conduct a separate meeting to show the risk identification analysis to the stakeholders. That way they can see the data and understand the potential impact on the project cost. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
1 year ago
C) Conduct a separate meeting to show the risk identification analysis to the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 year ago
A) Reinforce to the stakeholders that the risk identification was done properly during the last sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curtis
1 year ago
Maybe conducting a separate meeting to discuss the analysis could help address concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
I agree with Mitsue. It's important to show that the process was followed correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I think the risk manager should reinforce that the risk identification was done properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
1 year ago
I believe conducting a separate meeting to discuss the risk identification analysis could also help address concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
1 year ago
I agree with Maurine. It's important to show that the process was thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
1 year ago
I think the risk manager should reinforce that the risk identification was done properly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel