Discuss PMI PMI-RMP Exam Topic 8 Question 108

An experienced and the only developer on a software implementation project will be on leave for several weeks. The risk of this critical resource's availability was added to the risk register. Contingencies were made for a support developer to job shadow this resource, depending on how things go prior to their leave. The project team was pleased with the backup plan and the new resource was able to shadow for a few weeks.

What should the risk manager do next?

AUpdate the risk register to indicate the risk has occurred and close out the expired risk from the register.

BUpdate, continuously monitor, and communicate the residual and secondary risks of the backup resource on the project.

CHire a permanent developer to support the project, and work with the backup resource to eliminate this risk.

DHire another developer to support the project, contingent on when the experienced developer returns.

Suggested Answer: B

Once the contingency plan has been executed (e.g., the backup resource has shadowed the experienced developer), it is crucial to continuously monitor and manage any residual or secondary risks that may arise. These risks could include the backup resource's ability to perform effectively or the potential impact of the original developer's absence on project timelines. By updating the risk register and maintaining communication with the project team, the risk manager ensures that the project remains on track and that any new risks are promptly addressed, in alignment with PMI's best practices for ongoing risk management.

Get Premium PMI-RMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

29 comments · newest first

Edelmira 7 months ago

Option D could work, but it feels like a temporary fix.

Coral 7 months ago

I like option C. A permanent developer would provide long-term stability.

Shanice 7 months ago

Option A seems too quick. We shouldn't close the risk just yet.

Cortney 7 months ago

Agreed! We need to keep an eye on the backup resource's performance.

Elmira 7 months ago

I think option B is the best. Continuous monitoring is key.

Nana 8 months ago

I agree with B, but I wonder if the backup will really be effective.

Mitsue 8 months ago

D could lead to more confusion later on.

Annamae 8 months ago

Surprised they didn't hire someone permanent right away!

Gladys 9 months ago

A seems too quick. The risk isn't fully resolved yet.

Kris 9 months ago

I think B is the best option. Continuous monitoring is key!

Clarinda 9 months ago

Haha, the experienced dev better not take a vacation to the Bahamas!

Cassie 9 months ago

B is the way to go. Gotta keep an eye on those residual risks.

Dick 9 months ago

D is a good option too. Hiring another developer as a contingency plan is smart.

Lisandra 9 months ago

B is the correct answer. Continuously monitoring the backup resource is crucial.

Vanesa 10 months ago

I’m not confident about this, but I think option D might be too reactive. Shouldn't we focus on the backup resource first before hiring someone else?

Ettie 10 months ago

I’m leaning towards option C because hiring a permanent developer could provide long-term stability, but I wonder if that’s overkill for just a few weeks.

Gianna 10 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on risk management strategies. I feel like updating the risk register is important, but I’m torn between A and B.

Carmelina 10 months ago

I'm a little unsure on this one. Do we really need to hire another permanent developer? That seems like overkill if the experienced developer is just going to be out for a few weeks. I'm torn between options B and D.

Kristofer 10 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The risk has already occurred, so I think the best approach is to update the risk register and closely monitor the backup resource to address any secondary risks that come up.

Willow 11 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of monitoring residual risks, so option B seems like a good choice, but I'm not entirely sure if we should close the risk just yet.

Patti 11 months ago

I’m leaning towards B too. Communication is crucial for project success.

Eun 11 months ago

Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The risk has already materialized, so we need to update the register. Then, we should continuously monitor the backup resource and communicate any residual or secondary risks. Hiring another permanent developer doesn't seem necessary based on the information provided.

Helga 11 months ago

Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be managing the risk and ensuring the project is covered during the experienced developer's absence. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll need to think it through a bit more.

Brittney 12 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the potential implications of each approach.

Latrice 6 months ago

↳ replying to Brittney

True, but hiring someone new might take time. We need a quick solution.

Carmelina 6 months ago

↳ replying to Brittney

That's why option C makes sense. A permanent developer could really help.

Jamika 7 months ago

↳ replying to Brittney

But what if the backup resource isn't up to speed?

Shad 10 months ago

↳ replying to Brittney

Agreed! We can't just assume everything will be fine.

Pearline 11 months ago

↳ replying to Brittney

I think option B is the best. Continuous monitoring is key.

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 8 Question 108 Discussion