Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 7 Question 36 Discussion

Don is the project manager of the PFO project for his organization. Don is working with the project team members and two subject matter experts to assess the identified risk events in the project.Which of the following approaches is the best to assess the risk events in the project?
D) Interviews or meetings
A) Determination of the true cost of the risk event
B) Probability and Impact Matrix
C) Root cause analysis

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 7 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 7
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

Don is the project manager of the PFO project for his organization. Don is working with the project team members and two subject matter experts to assess the identified risk events in the project.

Which of the following approaches is the best to assess the risk events in the project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Thurman at May 03, 2022, 05:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-RMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Viola
10 months ago
True cost determination is too complex for quick assessments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
11 months ago
Wait, can interviews really assess risks effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
11 months ago
Definitely agree with the matrix approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
11 months ago
I think root cause analysis could be useful too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
11 months ago
Probability and Impact Matrix is a solid choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
11 months ago
The true cost determination sounds important, but I feel like it might come after assessing the risks rather than being the best initial approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think interviews or meetings could help gather insights, but they might not be the best for assessing risks quantitatively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
11 months ago
I remember studying the Probability and Impact Matrix; it seems like a solid way to prioritize risks based on their likelihood and potential impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think root cause analysis is more about understanding why risks happen rather than assessing them directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure. I'll need to review the differences between the Strategic Plan, Business Analysis Core Concept Model, and Business Analysis Scope Model to make the best decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The Scrum Master's job is to protect the team and the process, so the right answer is A - talking to the IT manager to explain how progress is measured in Scrum. The other options don't really fit with the Scrum framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
12 months ago
Guardians can be a tricky topic, but I think if I read through the options closely, I can determine the one that is not correct.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel