New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 2
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

When performing a risk analysis, a risk manager identifies not only negative risks but also positive risks, which might bring added value to the project. What should the risk manager do next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Peggie at Jun 01, 2024, 07:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-RMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Wilbert
3 months ago
Positive risks can add value, but they still need to be tracked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
3 months ago
D makes sense too! Prioritizing opportunities is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
3 months ago
Wait, can we really manage positive risks like that? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
4 months ago
Totally agree with B! Can't overlook those positive risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
4 months ago
I think B is the way to go. Gotta analyze and register them!
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 months ago
Creating a separate project for positive risks seems a bit excessive. I feel like they should be integrated into the overall risk management process instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I remember that managing both types of risks together is crucial. So, maybe option B is right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like prioritizing opportunities could be important too. Maybe that's what we should do next?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how positive risks can actually be opportunities, so I think analyzing them and adding them to the risk register makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
5 months ago
Creating a separate project just for positive risks seems like overkill. I think the best option is to prioritize the opportunities, since they can bring benefits to the overall project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to analyze both the positive and negative risks and add them to the risk register. That way I can manage them all as part of the overall project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about how to handle positive risks here. Do I need to treat them differently than negative risks? I'll have to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'll carefully review the options and think through the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The Compliance application is sending data to the Laboratory Management application, so that's an external input (EI) for the Laboratory Management app. But what about the Compliance app?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward multiple-choice question on the features of water-cooled chilled air conditioners. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which ones are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The question is asking us to analyze average sales by product number and country, so the correct answer is D. Year is not a necessary factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is the examination phase, where we use tools and techniques to extract information from the collected data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
5 months ago
The ncclient command to explore NETCONF capabilities is an interesting approach. I'll make sure to keep that in mind as a potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
9 months ago
I'm with Dannie on this one. Let's just throw caution to the wind and let the positive risks take over. What could possibly go wrong? Totally kidding, Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
8 months ago
Option D: Ignore the negative risks and focus only on exploiting the positive risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
8 months ago
Option C: Ignore the positive risks and focus only on mitigating the negative risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
8 months ago
Option B: Develop a plan to exploit the positive risks and minimize the negative risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
9 months ago
Option A: Develop a plan to mitigate the negative risks and maximize the positive risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannie
9 months ago
Ah, the age-old debate of positive versus negative risks. I say we just flip a coin and see what happens! Kidding, of course. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Creating a separate project just for positive risks seems a bit overkill. Wouldn't it be simpler to prioritize them within the existing risk management process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
10 months ago
I agree with Lilli. Separating positive and negative risks into different stakeholder groups or projects could create more complexity than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
8 months ago
Monitor and control the identified risks throughout the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
8 months ago
Develop a risk response plan for each identified risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
8 months ago
Identify strategies to manage both positive and negative risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lilli
10 months ago
Option B seems like the logical choice. We need to analyze both positive and negative risks and add them to the risk register to manage them effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
9 months ago
D) Prioritize opportunities as they are likely to bring benefits to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
9 months ago
B) Analyze the risks and add them to the risk register to continue the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
9 months ago
A) Assign separate stakeholder groups for positive risks and negative risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brynn
10 months ago
But shouldn't the risk manager also assign separate stakeholder groups for positive risks and negative risks to manage them effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
10 months ago
I agree with Delsie. Prioritizing opportunities is important as they can bring benefits to the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
11 months ago
I think the risk manager should analyze the risks and add them to the risk register to continue the process.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel