Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 8 Question 93 Discussion

The business analyst has completed the requirements gathering and documentation processes in developing a baseline document. Several signoffs are needed. During the joint review process with the key stakeholders, the stakeholders announce that they are still not ready to sign off due to a communication gap.Which technique should the business analyst have followed to ensure consensus?
B) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.
C) The business analyst should have reviewed the requirements of the project sponsor first before reviewing other requirements.
D) The business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 8 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 8
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

The business analyst has completed the requirements gathering and documentation processes in developing a baseline document. Several signoffs are needed. During the joint review process with the key stakeholders, the stakeholders announce that they are still not ready to sign off due to a communication gap.

Which technique should the business analyst have followed to ensure consensus?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, one of the techniques to ensure consensus among stakeholders is to conduct a pre-review of the requirements with the key stakeholders before the formal review meeting. This can help to identify and resolve any issues, gaps, or conflicts that may arise during the meeting. A pre-review can also help to build trust and rapport with the stakeholders, and increase their confidence and commitment to the requirements. A pre-review can be done through interviews, workshops, surveys, or other methods of communication.References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content:PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list:PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide:Study.com


by Mitsue at Nov 15, 2024, 06:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-PBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Colton
8 months ago
Not sure option C is the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
8 months ago
Definitely should have involved everyone earlier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
8 months ago
Wait, they didn't review with stakeholders before? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
9 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
9 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of miscommunication!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
9 months ago
I recall that we talked about prioritizing the project sponsor's input. So, option C might be relevant, but I still lean towards option B for overall stakeholder alignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
9 months ago
I think we practiced something similar where we emphasized the need for consensus. Option B seems like the best choice, but I wonder if option D could also play a role in ensuring everyone is on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option A could be useful too. If the business analyst had talked to peers first, it might have helped clarify things before the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
10 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder engagement in our last class. I think option B makes the most sense since it emphasizes reviewing with the key stakeholders beforehand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this. I'm torn between options B and D. I think the business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting, but I'm also wondering if a complete review with them beforehand would have been more effective. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
10 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The answer is clearly option B - the business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting. This would have helped ensure that everyone was on the same page before the joint review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
10 months ago
Okay, I've got an idea. Based on the information provided, I think the business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting. That way, they could have addressed any communication gaps or misunderstandings beforehand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options presented, and I'm not entirely sure which one would be the most effective approach. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about communication techniques. I think the key is to identify the best way to ensure consensus among the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
2 years ago
Option B all the way. The business analyst should have been on top of that communication gap before the big meeting. Gotta stay proactive, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Vonda
2 years ago
B) I agree, being proactive is key in ensuring effective communication and consensus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
2 years ago
A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noemi
2 years ago
I can't believe the stakeholders weren't ready to sign off. They must have been playing Candy Crush during the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
Theresia
2 years ago
C) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
2 years ago
B) The business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
2 years ago
A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaclyn
2 years ago
I'm going with option B. The business analyst should have done a complete review with the stakeholders beforehand. That's like Requirements Gathering 101.
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
2 years ago
User1: Definitely, communication is key in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 years ago
User3: Maybe next time they'll follow that process for better consensus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
User2: Yeah, reviewing with stakeholders beforehand would have helped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
2 years ago
User1: I agree, option B seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merlyn
2 years ago
I disagree. I think the business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting directly to address any communication gaps in real-time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
2 years ago
Nah, the business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting. How else were they supposed to sign off on the requirements?
upvoted 0 times
Stephane
2 years ago
C) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
2 years ago
B) The business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
2 years ago
A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tasia
2 years ago
I agree with you, Leonard. It's important to involve the key stakeholders in the review process to ensure their buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
2 years ago
The business analyst should have reviewed the requirements with the key stakeholders before the meeting. That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
Rodney
2 years ago
C) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
2 years ago
B) The business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 years ago
A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonard
2 years ago
I think the business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel