Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

A major stakeholder of a project is surprised to learn that a particular requirement was not implemented during the latest launch.The business analyst tells the stakeholder that the requirement status was changed to "deferred ''What could have prevented the stakeholder from being surprised about the status change?
B) The status should have been reviewed prior to project launch.
A) The status should have been communicated to the requirement's source.
C) The status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
D) The status should have been updated in the traceability matrix.

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

A major stakeholder of a project is surprised to learn that a particular requirement was not implemented during the latest launch.

The business analyst tells the stakeholder that the requirement status was changed to "deferred ''

What could have prevented the stakeholder from being surprised about the status change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Page at Sep 16, 2024, 03:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-PBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hailey
10 months ago
Not sure if all stakeholders needed to know, but it helps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
10 months ago
Reviewing the status before launch is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
10 months ago
Wait, they didn't update the traceability matrix? That's surprising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
10 months ago
I agree, all stakeholders need to be in the loop!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
Should've communicated the status change for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
11 months ago
I lean towards the idea that all project stakeholders should be informed. It seems like a fundamental part of project management to keep everyone in the loop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
11 months ago
I feel like updating the traceability matrix is important, but I'm not completely clear on how that directly relates to stakeholder awareness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
11 months ago
I think reviewing the status before the launch is crucial. We had a practice question that emphasized how oversight can lead to surprises like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of communication in our last study session, but I'm not sure if it was about informing all stakeholders or just the requirement's source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
11 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of project management best practices. I'll review the options and choose the one that best addresses the communication breakdown described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The stakeholder was surprised, so the status change wasn't properly communicated. Option C seems like the best choice to prevent that in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
11 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at here. The key is making sure the requirement status is properly communicated to all relevant stakeholders. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the key stakeholders and communication processes involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about communication and project management. I'll focus on reviewing the options and thinking through the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
1 year ago
Maybe the stakeholder should have been reading the project status reports instead of playing Candy Crush. C) is the correct answer, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
1 year ago
D) is tempting, but the traceability matrix is useless if no one checks it. C) is the right call, communicate with the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
1 year ago
Haha, reminds me of the time my boss asked about a feature that was 'lost in the sauce' for months. C) is the way to go, keep everyone informed!
upvoted 0 times
Mariann
1 year ago
B) The status should have been reviewed prior to project launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
1 year ago
C) The status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
A) The status should have been communicated to the requirement's source.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malika
1 year ago
Wow, the project manager really dropped the ball on this one. B) is the obvious choice - the status should have been reviewed before launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
The stakeholder should have been in the loop from the beginning. C) is the correct answer - the status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Sheridan
1 year ago
Stakeholder: It should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
Business Analyst: The status was changed to 'deferred'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 year ago
Stakeholder: Why wasn't the requirement implemented?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamika
1 year ago
Definitely, that would have prevented the surprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
1 year ago
Yeah, the status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
1 year ago
I can't believe the requirement was deferred without us knowing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel