New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

A major stakeholder of a project is surprised to learn that a particular requirement was not implemented during the latest launch.

The business analyst tells the stakeholder that the requirement status was changed to "deferred ''

What could have prevented the stakeholder from being surprised about the status change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hailey
3 months ago
Not sure if all stakeholders needed to know, but it helps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
3 months ago
Reviewing the status before launch is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
3 months ago
Wait, they didn't update the traceability matrix? That's surprising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
4 months ago
I agree, all stakeholders need to be in the loop!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
Should've communicated the status change for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
4 months ago
I lean towards the idea that all project stakeholders should be informed. It seems like a fundamental part of project management to keep everyone in the loop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
4 months ago
I feel like updating the traceability matrix is important, but I'm not completely clear on how that directly relates to stakeholder awareness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
4 months ago
I think reviewing the status before the launch is crucial. We had a practice question that emphasized how oversight can lead to surprises like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of communication in our last study session, but I'm not sure if it was about informing all stakeholders or just the requirement's source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
5 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of project management best practices. I'll review the options and choose the one that best addresses the communication breakdown described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The stakeholder was surprised, so the status change wasn't properly communicated. Option C seems like the best choice to prevent that in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at here. The key is making sure the requirement status is properly communicated to all relevant stakeholders. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the key stakeholders and communication processes involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about communication and project management. I'll focus on reviewing the options and thinking through the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
10 months ago
Maybe the stakeholder should have been reading the project status reports instead of playing Candy Crush. C) is the correct answer, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
10 months ago
D) is tempting, but the traceability matrix is useless if no one checks it. C) is the right call, communicate with the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
10 months ago
Haha, reminds me of the time my boss asked about a feature that was 'lost in the sauce' for months. C) is the way to go, keep everyone informed!
upvoted 0 times
Mariann
8 months ago
B) The status should have been reviewed prior to project launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
8 months ago
C) The status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
9 months ago
A) The status should have been communicated to the requirement's source.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malika
10 months ago
Wow, the project manager really dropped the ball on this one. B) is the obvious choice - the status should have been reviewed before launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
The stakeholder should have been in the loop from the beginning. C) is the correct answer - the status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Sheridan
8 months ago
Stakeholder: It should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
9 months ago
Business Analyst: The status was changed to 'deferred'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
9 months ago
Stakeholder: Why wasn't the requirement implemented?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamika
11 months ago
Definitely, that would have prevented the surprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
11 months ago
Yeah, the status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
11 months ago
I can't believe the requirement was deferred without us knowing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel