Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

The following requirement was included in a business requirements document: "An API shall be built to send data back and forth from the accounting system to the customer relationship system so that name and address data can be synchronized." What should be done with this business requirement?
D) It should remain because it specifies the reason why the business requirement is needed.
A) It should remain because it specifies the type of data and the source system.
B) It should be revised because it states a solution to the problem rather than the business need.
C) It should be removed because it does not state how often the data should be synchronized.

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 5
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

The following requirement was included in a business requirements document: "An API shall be built to send data back and forth from the accounting system to the customer relationship system so that name and address data can be synchronized." What should be done with this business requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Nieves at May 03, 2022, 09:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-PBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Margarita
7 months ago
No way, it’s too specific about the implementation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
7 months ago
I think it should stay, it outlines the data type clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
7 months ago
Wait, why does it not mention sync frequency? Seems important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
8 months ago
I agree, it’s more about the solution than the need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
8 months ago
It should be revised, definitely states a solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
8 months ago
I lean towards option D since it does explain why the synchronization is necessary, but I wonder if it’s enough to keep it as is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
8 months ago
I feel like option A could be valid because it does mention the data types and source systems, which are important for understanding the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
8 months ago
I think option B makes sense since it feels like the requirement is jumping to a solution instead of outlining the actual business need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about requirements needing to focus on the "what" rather than the "how." So maybe we should revise it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll need to review the OSHA regulations more closely to be confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
8 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'm leaning towards option B, setting the Unique String value to 'Error' in the Duplicate Handling options. That seems like it would be a straightforward way to stop the import if duplicates are found. But I'm also curious about option D, making sure the EnableSharedNodes property is set to False. I'll have to think about that one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
8 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Does modifying the action group actually meet the goal of ensuring the new security admin receives the alerts instead of me? I'll need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel