Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 4 Question 100 Discussion

Which of the following would be the best practice in product validation?
D) The evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement.
A) The measurement of the requirement should be based on the average of two or more evaluations.
B) There should be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement.
C) Two or more testers should test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent.

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 4 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 4
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

Which of the following would be the best practice in product validation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information.Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases.Reference: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Examination Content Outline2, page 17-18.


by Mi at Apr 09, 2025, 11:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-PBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lavonda
9 months ago
Averages can be misleading, so I’m not sure about A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
9 months ago
Wait, isn't D just stating the obvious?
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
9 months ago
I disagree, B makes more sense for thorough evaluations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
Wow, I never thought about testing consistency like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
10 months ago
I think option C is the best! Consistency is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
10 months ago
Option D seems logical since using the same criteria for evaluation would help maintain alignment with the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think option B is important for ensuring thoroughness in validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option A might be too vague. Averaging evaluations could lead to misleading results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
11 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar because it emphasizes consistency in testing, which we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. The evaluation criteria should match the original requirements, so that the product is being validated against the right standards. That seems like a solid best practice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to ensure consistency and reliability in the evaluation process. I think option C, where two or more testers use the same test cases, is the best way to achieve that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all sound similar, but I'm not sure which one is considered the "best" practice. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about product validation best practices. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one aligns best with the principles we've learned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
1 year ago
Why do you think option D is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
1 year ago
Ha! Imagine trying to validate a product using the average of two completely different evaluations. What a mess that would be. I'll go with D.
upvoted 0 times
Otis
1 year ago
I agree, sticking to the same evaluation criteria makes the most sense for product validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
1 year ago
Yeah, using different evaluations for the same requirement would definitely be chaotic. D seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reuben
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I guess B could work, but I feel like D is the safest bet. Consistency is key in product validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 year ago
I think C is the best answer. Having multiple testers using the same test cases ensures consistency in the evaluations.
upvoted 0 times
Vanda
1 year ago
True, but I still believe that having multiple testers using the same test cases is the best practice for product validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
I think that makes sense, but having two separate measurements for each functional requirement could also be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to base the measurement on the average of two or more evaluations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
1 year ago
I agree, having multiple testers using the same test cases is important for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
1 year ago
I think the evaluation criteria should definitely match what was used to measure the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 year ago
I see your point, but I think it's important to have separate measurements for each functional requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to base the measurement on the average of two or more evaluations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
1 year ago
I agree, having multiple testers using the same test cases is important for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodrigo
1 year ago
Option D seems the most logical choice to me. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with the original requirement measurement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
1 year ago
I think the best practice is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel