Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 3 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 3
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

A stakeholder requests to add new critical requirements the day before the scheduled baseline requirements approval meeting. The stakeholder insists that these requirements must be taken into account despite time and budget constraints.

What is the most effective way to manage this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, one of the best practices for managing changes to requirements is to communicate them to all relevant stakeholders and solicit their feedback before approving or rejecting the change request. This ensures that the impact of the change is understood and agreed upon by all parties, and that the change does not introduce any conflicts or inconsistencies with the existing requirements. By sharing the new requirements with all stakeholders and asking them to submit their comments before the meeting, the business analyst can facilitate a constructive discussion and reach a consensus on how to proceed with the change request.Reference: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 287-288.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Just stick to the original plan, we can't keep changing things last minute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
5 days ago
I'd suggest a good old-fashioned game of rock-paper-scissors to decide which requirements get prioritized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
10 days ago
Haha, the stakeholder must think we have a magic wand to make this happen overnight!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
15 days ago
Bring in the project sponsor to mediate and help the stakeholder understand the impact of the last-minute changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
21 days ago
Negotiate with the stakeholder to prioritize the new requirements and see if any can be deferred to a later phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
26 days ago
The stakeholder's request is unreasonable, and we should politely but firmly explain the constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
1 month ago
I think we should assess the impact of these new requirements on the project. Maybe we can suggest a phased approach if they can't wait for the next cycle?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
1 month ago
I feel a bit uncertain about the best approach here. Should we involve the project sponsor to help manage the stakeholder's expectations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
2 months ago
This situation feels similar to a practice question we did on scope creep. I think we might need to negotiate the requirements or push back on the timeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
2 months ago
I remember we discussed prioritizing requirements and how to handle last-minute changes, but I'm not sure how to balance that with the stakeholder's insistence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 months ago
Ooh, this is a classic project management challenge. I'd recommend standing firm on the timeline, but offering to re-evaluate the scope and see what can be reasonably added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
2 months ago
Yikes, that's a tough spot. I'd start by clarifying exactly what the new requirements are and why they're critical. Then I'd see if we can prioritize and scope them down to fit the timeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'd document the stakeholder's request and the constraints, then propose a phased approach to get the critical pieces in on time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
3 months ago
Ugh, last-minute changes are the worst. I'd push back firmly on the time and budget constraints, but try to find a creative solution that works for everyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
3 months ago
This seems like a tricky situation. I'd try to understand the stakeholder's reasoning and see if we can find a compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel