Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI Exam PMI-ACP Topic 9 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 9
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

A learn using Kanban identifies mat their cycle time has significant variation After brainstorming, the team determines that the root cause is the stones' varying sizes and risks What should the team do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nobuko at Dec 11, 2024, 08:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ira
20 days ago
Breaking down stories? Sounds like they're trying to put humpty dumpty back together again. But hey, at least it's not as bad as trying to herd cats!
upvoted 0 times
Malika
11 days ago
B: I think creating a triage step on the Kanban board to pre-identify risky stones could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
15 days ago
A: Let's reduce work in progress limits to accommodate slack for riskier stories.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelina
21 days ago
Option A sounds tempting, but reducing the WIP limits might just lead to a whole new set of problems. Better to address the root cause, like the team is doing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
23 days ago
Option D is intriguing, but I'm not sure creating a separate swimlane is the best solution. Seems like an unnecessary complication to the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Having a triage step to identify the risky stories upfront could be a game-changer. Proactive planning is key here.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
4 days ago
I agree, being proactive in identifying risky stories can definitely help improve our cycle time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
17 days ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. It can help us catch potential issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruby
1 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Breaking down the larger stories and adjusting the WIP accordingly should help manage the variation in cycle time.
upvoted 0 times
Wilda
15 days ago
Creating a dedicated overflow swimlane could also be a good idea to handle the larger stones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
23 days ago
We should also consider setting a policy to adjust the WIP limits accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
27 days ago
I agree, breaking down the larger stories will definitely help in managing the cycle time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
28 days ago
Option C seems like the best solution to address the varying sizes and risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Asha
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. Maybe we should consider option B as well to pre-identify risky stones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
2 months ago
I agree with Cletus. Option C seems like a practical solution to address the root cause of the variation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
2 months ago
I think we should go with option C. Breaking down larger stories can help reduce variation in cycle time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel