Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 9 Question 75 Discussion

When prioritizing features to be delivered in an iteration, on what features should an agile team defer work?
B) High-risk and low-value
A) High-risk and high-value
C) Low-risk and low-value
D) Low-risk and high-value

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 9 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 9
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

When prioritizing features to be delivered in an iteration, on what features should an agile team defer work?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Allene at Apr 20, 2024, 03:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Barbra
8 months ago
High-risk and high-value should be prioritized, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
8 months ago
Totally agree, low-risk and low-value can wait.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
8 months ago
Surprised that anyone would consider high-risk features at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
9 months ago
I think low-risk and low-value should be last on the list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
9 months ago
Definitely defer high-risk and low-value features!
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
9 months ago
If I remember correctly, low-risk and low-value features are usually the ones we can afford to delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
9 months ago
I feel like high-risk and high-value features might be important to tackle first, but I can't recall if we should defer them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
9 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think low-risk and low-value features are the ones we should push aside.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
10 months ago
I think we should definitely defer high-risk and low-value features, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards deferring the low-risk and low-value features. That seems like the safest bet to make the most progress in the iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
10 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. We want to deliver the most value in the iteration, so I'd say we should defer the high-risk and low-value features. That way we can tackle the riskier high-value ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'd want to defer the low-risk and low-value features to keep the iteration focused on the high-impact stuff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
10 months ago
This is a tricky one. I think the key is to focus on the risk and value of the features. High-risk and low-value features seem like the logical choice to defer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to think through the definition of non-assetization and how it applies to a low-cost promotional item like a coffee mug.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
10 months ago
I think the planning phase is the one that uses the most time and resources. That's where you really lay the groundwork for the whole project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know economic lot size has to do with balancing ordering and holding costs, but I'm not sure which action would reduce the lot size the most.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
2 years ago
Low-risk and low-value, option C, could be deferred too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 years ago
Agreed. Focusing on high-risk and high-value is probably better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
2 years ago
Makes sense. High-risk with low returns shouldn't be priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 years ago
I believe the answer is B, high-risk and low-value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
2 years ago
Yeah, I think it's about prioritizing features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
2 years ago
This question is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
2 years ago
I think we should prioritize low-risk and high-value features instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 years ago
But what about low-risk and low-value features? Shouldn't we defer those?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
2 years ago
No, we should focus on high-risk and high-value features to deliver first.
upvoted 0 times
Ora
2 years ago
But what if the low-risk features end up being more valuable in the long run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 years ago
C) Low-risk and low-value
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
2 years ago
Right, we want to tackle the riskiest and most valuable features first to mitigate any potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
2 years ago
A) High-risk and high-value
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
2 years ago
But shouldn't we prioritize high-risk features first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 years ago
D) Low-risk and high-value
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
2 years ago
Yes, those features have the most impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 years ago
A) High-risk and high-value
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Portia
2 years ago
When prioritizing features, we should defer work on high-risk and low-value features, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel