MENU
When prioritizing features to be delivered in an iteration, on what features should an agile team defer work?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
BA
Barbra
11 months ago
High-risk and high-value should be prioritized, no doubt!
AS
Ashton
11 months ago
Totally agree, low-risk and low-value can wait.
CO
Colette
12 months ago
Surprised that anyone would consider high-risk features at all!
ST
Starr
12 months ago
I think low-risk and low-value should be last on the list.
AL
Alpha
1 year ago
Definitely defer high-risk and low-value features!
WE
Werner
1 year ago
If I remember correctly, low-risk and low-value features are usually the ones we can afford to delay.
CI
Ciara
1 year ago
I feel like high-risk and high-value features might be important to tackle first, but I can't recall if we should defer them.
MA
Margot
1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think low-risk and low-value features are the ones we should push aside.
AA
Aaron
1 year ago
I think we should definitely defer high-risk and low-value features, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice for this question.
HE
Herman
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards deferring the low-risk and low-value features. That seems like the safest bet to make the most progress in the iteration.
CO
Colby
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. We want to deliver the most value in the iteration, so I'd say we should defer the high-risk and low-value features. That way we can tackle the riskier high-value ones.
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'd want to defer the low-risk and low-value features to keep the iteration focused on the high-impact stuff.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I think the key is to focus on the risk and value of the features. High-risk and low-value features seem like the logical choice to defer.
SH
Shawnee
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to think through the definition of non-assetization and how it applies to a low-cost promotional item like a coffee mug.
AN
Annabelle
1 year ago
I think the planning phase is the one that uses the most time and resources. That's where you really lay the groundwork for the whole project.
RE
Renea
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know economic lot size has to do with balancing ordering and holding costs, but I'm not sure which action would reduce the lot size the most.
NI
Nikita
2 years ago
Low-risk and low-value, option C, could be deferred too.
BR
Brock
2 years ago
Agreed. Focusing on high-risk and high-value is probably better.
RO
Roy
2 years ago
Makes sense. High-risk with low returns shouldn't be priority.
RA
Raina
2 years ago
I believe the answer is B, high-risk and low-value.
HE
Helene
3 years ago
Yeah, I think it's about prioritizing features.
LA
Latonia
3 years ago
This question is tricky.
PO
Portia
3 years ago
I think we should prioritize low-risk and high-value features instead.
ST
Stephane
3 years ago
But what about low-risk and low-value features? Shouldn't we defer those?
BE
Bernadine
3 years ago
No, we should focus on high-risk and high-value features to deliver first.
OR
Ora
3 years ago
But what if the low-risk features end up being more valuable in the long run?
LA
Lai
3 years ago
C) Low-risk and low-value
RU
Rusty
3 years ago
Right, we want to tackle the riskiest and most valuable features first to mitigate any potential issues.
ON
Oneida
3 years ago
A) High-risk and high-value
MA
Marica
3 years ago
But shouldn't we prioritize high-risk features first?
MA
Malcolm
3 years ago
D) Low-risk and high-value
ST
Stephen
3 years ago
Yes, those features have the most impact.
VI
Virgina
3 years ago
A) High-risk and high-value
PO
Portia
3 years ago
When prioritizing features, we should defer work on high-risk and low-value features, right?