Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 9 Question 26 Discussion

During a review session an agile team presented done requirements to a group of stakeholders Stakeholder feedback indicated that the done requirements failed to meet the most pressing needs and provide valueWhat should the team have done to prevent this?
D) Worked on features rather than a set of components
A) Reprioritized requirements prior to committing to iteration work
B) Ensured that requirements remained stable during the iteration cycle
C) Had stakeholders focus on items created after the product backlog was initially built

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 9 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 9
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

During a review session an agile team presented done requirements to a group of stakeholders Stakeholder feedback indicated that the done requirements failed to meet the most pressing needs and provide value

What should the team have done to prevent this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Abel at May 03, 2022, 10:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janae
10 months ago
Stability during the iteration is crucial, but it’s not always realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
11 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize they missed the mark that badly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
11 months ago
Not sure if that would have helped, requirements change all the time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
11 months ago
Totally agree, stakeholder input is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
11 months ago
They should've reprioritized the requirements before starting the iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
11 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we talked about focusing on the right backlog items. Maybe they should have engaged stakeholders more on the initial backlog?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like ensuring stability in requirements during the iteration could have helped avoid this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder involvement throughout the iteration. I think they should have prioritized requirements better before starting the work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
11 months ago
I think working on features instead of components could lead to more value, but I’m not confident if that’s the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
12 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is a question about validating a YAML file. I think the best approach is to carefully read through the options and try to identify the most appropriate utility for that task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
12 months ago
This seems straightforward. A composition initiator is a type of composition controller that handles nested composition logic, so the answer must be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
12 months ago
I've got this! The key is to identify the unique screen requirements for each issue type and sub-task. With that information, I can determine the number of new Screen Schemes needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
12 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The table structure and the composite key make it clear that Activity_Fee is dependent on both the Student_ID and Activity columns.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel