PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 9 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam

Question #: 26
Topic #: 9

During a review session an agile team presented done requirements to a group of stakeholders Stakeholder feedback indicated that the done requirements failed to meet the most pressing needs and provide value

What should the team have done to prevent this?

AReprioritized requirements prior to committing to iteration work

BEnsured that requirements remained stable during the iteration cycle

CHad stakeholders focus on items created after the product backlog was initially built

DWorked on features rather than a set of components

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Abel at May 03, 2022, 10:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Janae

5 months ago

Stability during the iteration is crucial, but it’s not always realistic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

6 months ago

Wow, I didn't realize they missed the mark that badly!

upvoted 0 times

...

Reena

6 months ago

Not sure if that would have helped, requirements change all the time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carma

6 months ago

Totally agree, stakeholder input is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Devorah

6 months ago

They should've reprioritized the requirements before starting the iteration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yan

6 months ago

This reminds me of a practice question where we talked about focusing on the right backlog items. Maybe they should have engaged stakeholders more on the initial backlog?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chauncey

6 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like ensuring stability in requirements during the iteration could have helped avoid this issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

6 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder involvement throughout the iteration. I think they should have prioritized requirements better before starting the work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domingo

7 months ago

I think working on features instead of components could lead to more value, but I’m not confident if that’s the main issue here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

7 months ago

I'm pretty confident this is a question about validating a YAML file. I think the best approach is to carefully read through the options and try to identify the most appropriate utility for that task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clarence

7 months ago

This seems straightforward. A composition initiator is a type of composition controller that handles nested composition logic, so the answer must be True.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashunda

7 months ago

I've got this! The key is to identify the unique screen requirements for each issue type and sub-task. With that information, I can determine the number of new Screen Schemes needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maybelle

7 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The table structure and the composite key make it clear that Activity_Fee is dependent on both the Student_ID and Activity columns.

upvoted 0 times

...