MENU
A product owner concludes that the majority of a project's value can be delivered by completing only the first half of the prioritized backlog. What should the product owner do next?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
ME
Melissa
11 months ago
Wait, how can they be sure the first half is enough value?
VE
Venita
11 months ago
Option D sounds better. Stakeholder input is important!
KA
Katina
12 months ago
Not so sure about that. What if the second half is crucial?
RO
Roxanne
12 months ago
Agree! Getting value out ASAP is key.
AN
An
1 year ago
I think they should definitely go with option C.
KA
Katina
1 year ago
Meeting with stakeholders sounds like a good idea, but I wonder if it might delay the project. Shouldn’t we just focus on delivering value quickly?
CA
Carlee
1 year ago
I feel like working with the team to deploy the first half makes sense, but what if the second half has critical features? I’m a bit torn on that.
DA
Daren
1 year ago
I remember a similar question where we had to decide whether to prioritize or remove backlog items. I’m not sure if removing the second half is the best approach.
ZA
Zachary
1 year ago
I think the product owner should definitely communicate with stakeholders first. It seems important to align on the value before making any changes.
RI
Ricki
1 year ago
This is a great question! I think the key is to balance delivering value quickly with maintaining a cohesive product roadmap. Reprioritizing the backlog items to future iterations could be a good compromise.
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
Meeting with the project stakeholders to review the backlog and determine if the scope should be adjusted seems like the most prudent move here. Gotta make sure everyone is on the same page.
DA
Danilo
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should the product owner just remove the second half of the backlog or try to reprioritize it? I'm not sure which option would be the best approach.
LI
Linn
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The product owner should definitely work with the team to deploy the first half of the backlog and ensure that value is realized. That's the most straightforward and practical solution.
BI
Billy
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully weigh the options and think through the implications of each approach.
SH
Sharee
1 year ago
Ah, the classic SQL insert statement. The missing word is "values" - can't forget that one. Time to put my SQL skills to the test!
TU
Tu
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to use a journal type that allows me to directly adjust the inventory amount for the specific item and warehouse. The Inventory adjustment journal should do the trick.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
EIGRP summarization sounds more about routing efficiency, not necessarily convergence speed. I'm leaning towards BFD.
CA
Candida
1 year ago
This looks straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is B - the response is chunked.
PA
Paris
2 years ago
I don't know, it seems like a waste to just throw away the second half of the backlog. Why not see if we can find a way to deliver it later?
EL
Eloisa
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe we can find a way to deliver the second half of the backlog in a different way.
AL
Altha
1 year ago
User 2: That's a good idea, we shouldn't just throw away the work that's already been done.
AU
Audry
2 years ago
User 1: We could reprioritize the backlog items to future iterations.
PA
Paola
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the stakeholders would love to hear that we're only doing half the work! But in all seriousness, meeting with them to review the backlog is probably a good idea.
FI
Fidelia
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the stakeholders would love to hear that we're only doing half the work! But in all seriousness, meeting with them to review the backlog is probably a good idea.
BA
Barrie
2 years ago
D) Meet with project stakeholders to review the backlog and determine if the scope should be adjusted.
AL
Alpha
2 years ago
A) Remove the second half of the backlog, and communicate their decision in the next backlog grooming meeting.
BE
Beth
2 years ago
I'm not sure if removing the second half of the backlog is the best idea. We should reprioritize and see what can be moved to future iterations.
MA
Maxima
1 year ago
B) Reprioritize backlog items to future iterations.
LA
Lavonda
2 years ago
A) Remove the second half of the backlog, and communicate their decision in the next backlog grooming meeting.
CL
Clay
2 years ago
I think option C is the way to go. We should work with the team to deliver the first half and make sure the value is realized.
GO
Goldie
2 years ago
I agree with Lorrie, deploying the first half will ensure value is realized.
LO
Lorrie
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe they should work with the team to deploy the first half of the backlog.
KI
Kindra
2 years ago
I think the product owner should remove the second half of the backlog.