Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 7 Question 35 Discussion

A project is starling and the type of wont is complex and suitable for agile in assessing the learn members it appears that co-location would be a challenge.What should the agile practitioner do?
A) Select and implement collaboration tools to augment team interactions
B) Provide each geographical area with their own product owner and divide the work between the teams
C) increase the number of requirements documents and ensure they are dearly communicated
D) After several sprints calcuate velocity based on primary learn location and use secondary team as reserve

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 7 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 7
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

A project is starling and the type of wont is complex and suitable for agile in assessing the learn members it appears that co-location would be a challenge.

What should the agile practitioner do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Helga at May 07, 2022, 02:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Clarence
9 months ago
More requirements documents? That sounds counterproductive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
9 months ago
Wait, are we really relying on velocity from just one location?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
9 months ago
Dividing work by geographical area could lead to silos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
9 months ago
I think option A is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
9 months ago
Collaboration tools are a must for remote teams!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
10 months ago
Option D sounds interesting, but I wonder if calculating velocity based on location is really the best approach. It seems a bit complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think increasing documentation like in option C might slow us down instead of helping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think having separate product owners for different locations might complicate things. Option B feels risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
10 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of collaboration tools in our agile training. It seems like option A could really help with co-location issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
10 months ago
The scenario describes a mix of security measures and remaining gaps. I'll need to evaluate the significance of the gaps to determine if this is a major or minor issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Does the close() method automatically commit the offsets, or does it just trigger a rebalance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
10 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Are private IPs more secure than public IPs? I'm not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
10 months ago
I might be overthinking this, but I remember some guidelines stating we need to cover both aspects in a government audit report. It's so easy to mix them up, though!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel