Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 7 Question 23 Discussion

A legal department representative contacts the scrum master because white the projects budget has been maintained it has exceeded its original contracted time and scope. What should the scrum master do?
D) Meet with the legal department to help them understand that the customer and the team are satisfied with the time and deliverables
A) Meet with the team to gam alignment with the legal department's need to stay within the contracted time and scope
B) Work with the customer to narrow me scope
C) Share the project's trajectory with the legal department

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 7 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 7
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

A legal department representative contacts the scrum master because white the projects budget has been maintained it has exceeded its original contracted time and scope. What should the scrum master do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Kris at May 05, 2022, 11:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Salome
7 months ago
Sharing the trajectory is important, but it might not solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
7 months ago
Meeting with the legal team sounds like a good idea, but will they even listen?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
7 months ago
Honestly, I'm surprised this project went over time and scope. What happened?
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
8 months ago
I disagree, option B is better. Narrowing the scope is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
8 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. Transparency is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
8 months ago
I wonder if meeting with the legal department directly is the best approach. It could help, but I’m not sure if it addresses the root of the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
8 months ago
I feel like sharing the project's trajectory with the legal department could help clarify things. It might show them we're on track despite the time issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question where narrowing the scope was emphasized. Maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
8 months ago
I think the scrum master should definitely meet with the team first to align on the legal department's concerns. That seems like a good starting point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
8 months ago
Okay, let me see. I remember DSDM is all about delivering the most valuable features first, so I'm guessing the answer has to do with adjusting the scope to fit the time and budget. I'll go with C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
8 months ago
Yeah, this is a no-brainer. Assigning to the OU is definitely the way to go for a large group like that. Saves a ton of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
8 months ago
I'm not too familiar with OSPF route policies, so I'll need to think this through step-by-step. I'll start by reviewing the exhibit and the question details to see if I can identify the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel