Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Two teams have received project requirements and completed estimates. Team A estimates 420 story points for scope and 30 story points for velocity per sprint. Team B estimates 280 story points for scope and 20 story points for velocity per sprint. Both teams have same number of team members and have an assumed sprint duration of 2 weeks.What can an agile practitioner conclude about team A and team B's estimates?
A) Team B has underestimated scope compared to team A.
B) Team A is more confident in delivering velocity than team B.
C) Both teams need to indicate their proposed technology before the estimates can be analyzed.
D) Both teams have estimated the project to be of same size.

PMI-ACP Exam - Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-ACP exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 5
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

Two teams have received project requirements and completed estimates. Team A estimates 420 story points for scope and 30 story points for velocity per sprint. Team B estimates 280 story points for scope and 20 story points for velocity per sprint. Both teams have same number of team members and have an assumed sprint duration of 2 weeks.

What can an agile practitioner conclude about team A and team B's estimates?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Alex at Sep 19, 2024, 05:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chau
10 months ago
Not sure about that, but both teams should clarify their tech choices first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
10 months ago
Wait, how can both teams have the same number of members but such different estimates?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
10 months ago
Team A seems more confident in their velocity for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
10 months ago
I think Team B's scope is definitely underestimated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
11 months ago
Team A has way more story points than Team B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
11 months ago
Both teams have different story point estimates, so I don't think they see the project as the same size, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
11 months ago
I feel like the technology used could really impact the estimates, but I can't recall if we need that info to analyze the estimates properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think we had a practice question where underestimating scope led to issues later on. Could that apply here with Team B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how velocity can indicate confidence, so maybe Team A really believes they can deliver more than Team B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
11 months ago
Based on the information provided, it seems like Team B has underestimated the scope compared to Team A. I'll make sure to carefully compare the estimates to identify any potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. Team A has a higher scope estimate but also a higher velocity per sprint. Team B has lower estimates all around. I'd say Team A is more confident in their ability to deliver.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different story point estimates. Do we need more information about the teams' experience or the project requirements to really analyze this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I can compare the scope and velocity estimates to determine which team is more confident in their delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
1 year ago
Ah, I see the teams are playing a game of 'my estimate is bigger than yours.' Someone call the project management Olympics, we've got a winner!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
Well, if both teams have the same number of members and sprint duration, then the difference in their estimates must mean they've sized the project differently. Option D seems to be the most logical conclusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
1 year ago
I'm not sure proposed technology has much to do with these estimates. The question clearly states the teams have the same number of members and sprint duration, so I don't think Option C is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
1 year ago
Team A's velocity estimate of 30 story points per sprint is higher than Team B's 20 story points per sprint, so Team A does seem more confident in their ability to deliver velocity. Option B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
Jimmie
1 year ago
B) Team A is more confident in delivering velocity than team B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 year ago
A) Team B has underestimated scope compared to team A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittni
1 year ago
Team A's estimate of 420 story points for scope is significantly higher than Team B's 280 story points, so it's clear that Team B has underestimated the scope in comparison to Team A. Option A is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Maybelle
1 year ago
Team A is more confident in delivering velocity than team B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 year ago
Team A's estimate of 420 story points for scope is significantly higher than Team B's 280 story points, so it's clear that Team B has underestimated the scope in comparison to Team A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terina
1 year ago
But Team B has a lower velocity per sprint, so they might struggle to deliver on time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
I agree with you, Pamella. Team A's higher story points for scope indicate that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
I think Team A has estimated a larger scope than Team B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel